- 6,104
- 5,106
So, after a little spout I had on a Dragonball discussion thread regarding our Discussion Rules and the effect of their practice, Assaltwaffle came to me to discuss solutions.
At the moment, we have too many Discussuon Rules that prevent those with varying opinions to challenge our decisions in certain CRTs. Rules preventing people from downgrading Base Goku from 3-A or upgrade Kaguya to 4-C or higher, simply because we've debunked them multiple times.
I realize these rules were made under pressure and stress, which is why I need to tell you all that no rule should be made under pressure or stress. We have to respect everyone's opinion. So what do I propose we do? Make a single Discussion Rule, something along the lines of "Please do not create Content Revision threads that have been repeatedly debunked without new evidence to support it". Simple enough, right? Assaltwaffle of course agrees.
"Maybe we can link blogs for that one rule that contain the reasons why we currently accept the more controversial topics. That way if someone makes a thread we can give them the respective blog of reasoning and, if that user has nothing else to provide for the discussion, then close the thread.
Preventing them outright in the current manner really makes VSB prone to circle-jerking and the suppression of possible new interpretations or opinions that aren't just recycled." - Assaltwaffle
So, that's the basic premise.
At the moment, we have too many Discussuon Rules that prevent those with varying opinions to challenge our decisions in certain CRTs. Rules preventing people from downgrading Base Goku from 3-A or upgrade Kaguya to 4-C or higher, simply because we've debunked them multiple times.
I realize these rules were made under pressure and stress, which is why I need to tell you all that no rule should be made under pressure or stress. We have to respect everyone's opinion. So what do I propose we do? Make a single Discussion Rule, something along the lines of "Please do not create Content Revision threads that have been repeatedly debunked without new evidence to support it". Simple enough, right? Assaltwaffle of course agrees.
"Maybe we can link blogs for that one rule that contain the reasons why we currently accept the more controversial topics. That way if someone makes a thread we can give them the respective blog of reasoning and, if that user has nothing else to provide for the discussion, then close the thread.
Preventing them outright in the current manner really makes VSB prone to circle-jerking and the suppression of possible new interpretations or opinions that aren't just recycled." - Assaltwaffle
So, that's the basic premise.