• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Infinitely Above Baseline 2-A not possible?

Yobo_Blue

Yobo_Blue

Messages
31,701
Reaction score
5,479
So, recently we've been getting a lot of 2-A's who are infinitely above baseline 2-A. However, that doesn't really make sense based on the tiering system. 2-A is already the High 3-A of the 4-D tiers, meaning it and of itself fulfills the role of being infinite for that tier. Infinity doesn't really work like that. Infinity + any number isn't actually more than infinity. To actually be infinitely above baseline, you would have to be a uncountable infinity stronger, which would make these 2-A's High 2-A's in reality. Is their something I'm not getting here?
 
High Multiverse level+: Characters who are 5-dimensional, and/or can destroy and/or create 5-dimensional space-time constructs of a not insignificant size. Characters who can destroy and/or create an uncountably infinite numbers of universes may potentially also be assigned this tier, as their geometrical 5-D size can be higher than 0.

2-A is 4-D

High 2-A is 5-D

There is no end to infinity. How high into infinity a 4-D character doesn't matter they can't become 5-D, if not their verse not scale that way of course.
 
I don't think you quite got my point. If you take a look at our 3-D High 3-A to our 4-D High 3-A standards they show that infinitely above 2-A baseline is either actually baseline 2-A or High 2-A
 
That's literally not my point.

(It's also found for being uncountable 4-D infinities BTW)
 
Mindovin said:
High Multiverse level+: Characters who are 5-dimensional, and/or can destroy and/or create 5-dimensional space-time constructs of a not insignificant size. Characters who can destroy and/or create an uncountably infinite numbers of universes may potentially also be assigned this tier, as their geometrical 5-D size can be higher than 0.

2-A is 4-D

High 2-A is 5-D

There is no end to infinity. How high into infinity a 4-D character doesn't matter they can't become 5-D, if not their verse not scale that way of course.
Click to expand...
Exactly. My point is they can't be infinitely above 2-A unless they were uncountable, which they likely aren't
 
Paulo.junior.969 said:
I don't think you can reach a higher dimension by just staking infinities above each other.
Click to expand...
What I'm trying to say is that you can't actually have something infinitely above infinity without being uncountable, so having a AP infinitely above infinity is impossible.
 
Homu Sweet Homu said:
Merely being infinitely stronger than a 2-A isn't High 2-A.

Transcendenting them is.
Click to expand...
Homu

Did you read my above clarification?
 
Paulo.junior.969 said:
Well, we're talking about fiction here, so, I'm pretty sure it is pretty possible.
Click to expand...
If we're going by what fiction says is possible, you can be above Tier 0. This is dimensional tiering.

Also, that's not to say they aren't infinitely stronger, but that the only way they could be is to be uncountable.
 
What Yobo is trying to say is that it doesn't make any sense for someone to be stronger (let alone infinitely) than someone that has already "infinite power" in his dimensional plane.
 
Some infinities are greater than other infinities.
 
Sorry, I should have worded it differently.

I was told that Infinitely above one Multiverse isn't enough to High 2-A rating. You can have infinite strenght, but you are still limited by the dimension you were exists (4-D).

A 4-D space doesn't necessarily possess only one Multiverse, it could contains up to Infinite Multiverse.

Transcendenting completely that would be High 2-A.
 
Homu Sweet Homu said:
Sorry, I should have worded it differently.

I was told that Infinitely above one Multiverse isn't enough to High 2-A rating. You can have infinite strenght, but you are still limited by the dimension you were exists (4-D).

A 4-D space doesn't necessarily possess only one Multiverse, it could contains up to Infinite Multiverse.

Transcendenting completely that would be High 2-A.
Click to expand...
Exactly. But baseline 2-A already is infinite, so being infinitely above it would only be possible if you did transcend 4-D space.
 
Characters only make it into infinitely above baseline 2-A by scaling off of others though, and in the series that end up like this like digimon and SMT the 5-Ds are clearly defined as far above and transcendent even to these infinite 2-As. Simply put, we can't bump people explicitly stated to be 5D into 1-C and beyond off of scaling, and having 2-As in the same level as beings stated to transcend them doesn't work.
 
I never understood the idea that "infinitely above a tier = the next dimensional level". Being infinitely stronger doesn't give you another entire axis of movement.
 
Wokistan said:
Characters only make it into infinitely above baseline 2-A by scaling off of others though, and in the series that end up like this like digimon and SMT the 5-Ds are clearly defined as far above and transcendent even to these infinite 2-As. Simply put, we can't bump people explicitly stated to be 5D into 1-C and beyond off of scaling, and having 2-As in the same level as beings stated to transcend them doesn't work.
Click to expand...
In that case they would be Low infinity. We can't assume they aren't High 2-A simply because people are above them. Also, what exactly was the "infinitely above baseline" justification again for those 2 again"
 
SMT and Digimon have long scaling chains that I do not have memorized since neither are series I'm big in to. You should be able to find them on blogs, but I think at least one character 1 shotted an infinite amount of baseline 2-As for their layer.
 
Fiction doesn't have to make sense, it's fiction.

Uncountable set of infinity>countable set of infinity even if you multiply that countable set by infinity from my understanding.

Even if a character was infinitely above a High 3-A, it wouldn't suddenly make them 4-D. And we have characters infinitely above High 1-B don't we? Sure as heck doesn't make them 1-A.
 
Just found this, but to answer Yobo's question

These files answer your question of why SMT and Digimon are infinitely above baseline. I believe the Ur Dragon is this as well.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Kagutsuchi_(Shin_Megami_Tensei)

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mother_Eater

Here are the blogs for both.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Executor_N0/Digimon_Franchise:_The_Digital_World

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Ultima_Reality/Shin_Megami_Tensei_Explanation_Blog
 
Yeah, I didn't know what it was for, but I remember hearing that he was infinitely above baseline for something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Nekobako
Question about immeasurable above baseline
Replies
9
Views
551
Voidnether
Voidnether
Peter1129
High 3-A downscaling
Replies
13
Views
1K
Peter1129
Peter1129
TheUnshakableOne
Being endlessly/endless/infinitely larger than 2-C structure = 2-A?????
Replies
11
Views
1K
CodeCCLL
CodeCCLL
Lord_Zeref_Dragneel
Question regarding different levels of infinity and also possible reevaluation for space time continuum
Replies
16
Views
1K
Eclipso
Eclipso
TheOrangeGuy09
Temporal axises and HDE manipulation
Replies
26
Views
1K
Laviossiii
Laviossiii
Back
Top