Being endlessly/endless/infinitely larger than 2-C structure = 2-A?????

[TheUnshakableOne]

Short easy question, is being endlessly/endless/Infinitely bigger than a 2-C structure yield a 2-A rating?

If it needs more context what kind of context would it need?

My train of thought was similar to the infinity x 2-C multipliers where it's just not enough.

I thought that was the wiki official stance but was being told differently off site.

 

[KLOL506]

Last I recall, no, because of something to do with multiplier standards not working for Structures for 2-C.

You need blatant statements for a 2-A space (That it can hold an infinite number of space-time continuums or that no matter how many space-time continuums exist they will never be able to fill up said space).

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

Last I recall, no, because of something to do with multiplier standards not working for Structures for 2-C.

You need blatant statements for a 2-A space (That it can hold an infinite number of space-time continuums or that no matter how many space-time continuums exist they will never be able to fill up said space).

I'm not talking about a multiplier (for clarification) but a space stated to be Endless endlessly, or infinitely larger and holds 2-C structures/Universes

 

[KLOL506]

I'm not talking about a multiplier (for clarification) but a space stated to be Endless endlessly, or infinitely larger and holds 2-C structures/Universes

I know what you're talking about, and that still unfortunately falls under the multiplier argument.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

I know what you're talking about, and that still unfortunately falls under the multiplier argument.

Thank you! I was thinking the same thing but wanted clarification

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

If there's an inflationary multiverse theory, expanding endlessly or infinitely in the context of new universes being born left and right easily justifies 2-B. Or if there is proof that there's an infinite number of characters who dream and each and every dream births a universe, that combo could justify 2-A. But as KLOL said, stacking multipliers wouldn't grant anything higher than 2-C or "Endless/Infinite" could just be referring to the 3-D space of the universes and not the multiverse.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

If there's an inflationary multiverse theory, expanding endlessly or infinitely in the context of new universes being born left and right easily justifies 2-B. Or if there is proof that there's an infinite number of characters who dream and each and every dream births a universe, that combo could justify 2-A. But as KLOL said, stacking multipliers wouldn't grant anything higher than 2-C or "Endless/Infinite" could just be referring to the 3-D space of the universes and not the multiverse.

Well what I'm referring to is specifically a space described as Endless, Endlessly, and infinitely, and it greater than and holds only a 2-C amount of universes. They aren't expanding or growing.

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

I'm not talking about a multiplier (for clarification) but a space stated to be Endless endlessly, or infinitely larger and holds 2-C structures/Universes

If these structures exists infinitely through the endless space then it is 2-A

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

If these structures exists infinitely through the endless space then it is 2-A

There is a finite amount of universe's within this endless structure.

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

Theirs a finite amount I'd universe's

So no

 

[ProfectusInfinity]

Short easy question, is being endlessly/endless/Infinitely bigger than a 2-C structure yield a 2-A rating?

If it needs more context what kind of context would it need?

My train of thought was similar to the infinity x 2-C multipliers where it's just not enough.

I thought that was the wiki official stance but was being told differently off site.

No, because a space-time continuum is infinite by default, so any space between timelines is already infinite on a 4-D level.

If a space between 2 universes was called “infinite” in a vacuum, that wouldn’t yield a rating since such a scope is the default assumption.

 

[CodeCCLL]

Short easy question, is being endlessly/endless/Infinitely bigger than a 2-C structure yield a 2-A rating?

It's not enough alone.

If it needs more context what kind of context would it need?

DontTalkDT's main answer.

A summary of the parts agreed upon.

What is meant needs to be judged based on context. Kinda hard to make a criteria that covers every possible scenario.

Infinitely larger in general doesn't get you to Low 1-C whether from Low 2-C or from 2-A.

If we go by that, then you need either actually infinite universes (or equivalent) or something made clear to be size wise equivalent to such (e.g. due to having the capability to hold that number of universes)

I was thinking that way too.