I read it over a few times and im still not sure how it applies to her, as the q&a does not mention her. the inverse cosmology may still be countless, as the author makes the distinction of saying if such a set exists instead of outright stating it exists
From what I read UEG is Low 1-A because she transcends an endless number of higher-level spacetimes, referring to the embedding of higher dimensions which is a High 1-B Structure. If Yogiri transcends even that, then he's 1-A, the author statement is not the main deciding factor.
Afaik, this hierarchy was 1-B before the statement, as there was no concrete evidence of it being infinite instead of countless,endless,etc. Also there needs to be a level of inaccessiblity, which just being a level higher doesn't satisfy. There is no evidence in series that he is inaccessibly above ueg.
She transcends the foundation of which the hierarchy is built and restrained, the multiverse and it's space-time, therefor Low 1-A.
Transcending Low 1-A, in the same way Low 1-A transcends High 1-B is enough.
Ultimate Ensemble/Type IV multiverse feats are inherently Low 1-A in the wiki. Thats the reason why it stopped being 1-B. The hierarchy of higher universes is an ultimate ensemble itself.
low 1-a must exist outside of the high 1-b hierarchy, inaddition to being superior
Yogiri is transcendent over the cosmology which is a type 4 multiverse... UEG just scales to the cosmology.
Nothing under High 1-A is inaccessible, all the gaps between tiers are just different levels of uncountable infinity, which is equivalent to basic qualitative transcendence. On top of that, one of his quotes directly states that no one could ever hope to surpass him, he is beyond everything else in the verse.
checkk the justification for 1-a, it lists an inaccessible cardinal. it also says just being infinite + 5 layers is not enough. the quote could just mean normalto qualitative superiority
transcendence is not equal to inaccessible in most cases
Are we reading the same tiering system? Inaccessible cardinals start at High 1-A, not 1-A.
Wrong, it says Alephs, which are simply higher infinities and have a gap of uncountable infinity, which is normal qualitative superiority.
And normal qualitative superiority over Low 1-A is 1-A, just accept you are mistaken and close this CRT.
1-a literally lists it as an example
Alephs arent inaccessible cardinals.
yeah, this can be closed ig. i thought the only evidence was that author interview
