• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

World universe

mal

Messages
623
Reaction score
114
how did we knew world=4D

does world = universel (4d) if it stated "the space keep expanding"

what tier would u be if u can destroy it ?

what tier would u be if u destroyed "part of the world history (past)?
 
how did we knew world=4D

does world = universel (4d) if it stated "the space keep expanding"

what tier would u be if u can destroy it ?

what tier would u be if u destroyed "part of the world history (past)?
I'm assuming you are asking how we determine if someone referring to a "world" can refer to an entire universe or other type of 4D space. In which case, it's really just dependent on the information from the verse itself. For example, in JoJo part 7, Funny Valentine describes the alternate universes he can travel to be "other worlds".

For the second point, not really sure what you mean. A 4D space is just an entire spacetime continuum, which doesn't inherently have to be infinite to my understanding. A universe that is not infinite but rather is still expanding can be 4D as long as it has its own spacetime.

Destroying a 4D universe is Low 2-C or Universal level+

Destroying a portion of time within a universe, such as its history would be High 3-A, such as King Crimson in JoJo getting High 3-A off erasing a 10 second portion of time.
 
I'm assuming you are asking how we determine if someone referring to a "world" can refer to an entire universe or other type of 4D space. In which case, it's really just dependent on the information from the verse itself. For example, in JoJo part 7, Funny Valentine describes the alternate universes he can travel to be "other worlds".
how about that world stated to be another space-time?
For the second point, not really sure what you mean. A 4D space is just an entire spacetime continuum, which doesn't inherently have to be infinite to my understanding. A universe that is not infinite but rather is still expanding can be 4D as long as it has its own spacetime.

Destroying a 4D universe is Low 2-C or Universal level+
its never stated that world that have different space time. it only stated the other world time move faster/slower than another world.
Destroying a portion of time within a universe, such as its history would be High 3-A, such as King Crimson in JoJo getting High 3-A off erasing a 10 second portion of time.
how about capable to destroyed 700m millions of the past world like MGK?
 
how about that world stated to be another space-time?
Unless there are anti-feats like the size of the world being too small (akin to a mini pocket reality), that's normally enough for it being considered Low 2-C, yeah.
its never stated that world that have different space time. it only stated the other world time move faster/slower than another world.
That could be used as supporting evidence, but not as the main argument since under relativity, different places inside the universe can have different rate of time flow.
how about capable to destroyed 700m millions of the past world like MGK?
That's 3A yes. Destroying a finite non-zero amount of the past, present or future means destroying a countably infinite amount of snapshots of the universe that equals said finite time.
Note that finite time=countably infinite snapshots and infinite time=uncountably infinite snapshots. Examples are points on a line segment for the prior and points on an infinite line for the latter.
 
Unless there are anti-feats like the size of the world being too small (akin to a mini pocket reality), that's normally enough for it being considered Low 2-C, yeah.
lets say it never stated how big it is. it just stated "the space keep expanding"
That could be used as supporting evidence, but not as the main argument since under relativity, different places inside the universe can have different rate of time flow.
so just because "otherworld" time move faster/slower than otherworld doesnt mean its 4D/Universe right?

That's 3A yes. Destroying a finite non-zero amount of the past, present or future means destroying a countably infinite amount of snapshots of the universe that equals said finite time.
Note that finite time=countably infinite snapshots and infinite time=uncountably infinite snapshots. Examples are points on a line segment for the prior and points on an infinite line for the latter.
so is it 3A for that feat or 2A?bcuz i saw in old reply said its only 3A if u destroyed world history. its kinda hard to research anymore bcuz i cant find MGK cosmology page anymore
 
lets say it never stated how big it is. it just stated "the space keep expanding"
In that case, the opinion of staff ultimately differs.

But on the side I lean on due to @Ultima_Reality's explanation that physical matter is ultimately irrelevant in the grand scheme of things that is Space and Time.
Since even empty spaces holds the potential to hold as much physical matter as a completely filled space, if the size of the Universe, even if it's just infinitely expanding space with little amounts of matter, would be significant, physically 3-A, Eventually High 3-A while as a space time continuum it'll be Low 2-C
so just because "otherworld" time move faster/slower than otherworld doesnt mean its 4D/Universe right?
Yes, although if they're outright stated to be separate continuums, then different flows of time wouldn't be a disqualifier of that either.

However, a different flow of time by itself isn't enough to prove a different continuum, since even in our universe there are different places with different flows of time.
so is it 3A for that feat or 2A?bcuz i saw in old reply said its only 3A if u destroyed world history. its kinda hard to research anymore bcuz i cant find MGK cosmology page anymore
It is 3-A (high 3-A to be specific), but depending on context it could be higher.
 
Back
Top