• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Ztesrxgdfjcvgkbh said:
I would like to report Clousure for making several unconventional edits to Thomas’ profile. These include adding unnecessary uppercase text to the Level section, inserting excessive amounts of text, creating reference issues, adding new weaknesses, and placing the page in the Blog Posts category, among other changes. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Thomas_(Maze_Runner)?curid=3259579&diff=9357941&oldid=8757791
Click to expand...
I think that a part of those changes seem like constructive improvements, especially the explanations added to the summary, powers and abilities, range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections. Previously they were extremely lacking and empty.

Is it acceptable if I restore that information? I add my personal retroactive acceptance for those additions if that is sufficient, as they seem self-evident and uncontroversial. 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
I think that a part of those changes seem like constructive improvements, especially the explanations added to the summary, powers and abilities, range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections. Previously they were extremely lacking and empty.

Is it acceptable if I restore that information? I add my personal retroactive acceptance for those additions if that is sufficient, as they seem self-evident and uncontroversial. 🙏
Click to expand...
I believe that many of the additions he made would require a CRT. For example:
  • He added “but is unconfirmed in the movies” to the Telepathy section.
  • He added long walls of text to Thomas’ Powers & Abilities section without providing scans to all of them.
  • He added numerous YouTube video links. However, these videos are often taken down. It would be preferable to upload the relevant scenes directly to the wiki instead.
  • In the Striking Strength section, he added (Same feats as listed under Attack Potency), which is redundant.
  • He replaced this short reference that linked to a calculation: ''It would yield this much energy'', with this lengthy explanation: ''According to some calculations, Thomas withstood 26–41 G-forces…'', which is unnecessary and should remain concise.
  • He added Thomas’ immune system under Durability, stating that it recovered from injuries quickly (e.g., a gunshot wound healing after a few days). This seems more appropriate for Regeneration or Healing and would still require justification.
  • He added a very large wall of text to the Weaknesses section, which should also require a CRT.
Overall, many of these edits aren't minor clarifications and should be discussed and approved through the CRT process first. At the very least, the verse supporters should have been notified beforehand.
 
vsbattles.fandom.com

Jeffrey Epstein

9c||high 6c with his private island||high 1a+ with absolute diddling potential he likes to swing his big sausage at kids he is infriends with trump агсл тшппук he lost his right ball when he nutted into 3 year old and awakened 2% of his true diddling potential
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
GunshyFever said:
vsbattles.fandom.com

Jeffrey Epstein

9c||high 6c with his private island||high 1a+ with absolute diddling potential he likes to swing his big sausage at kids he is infriends with trump агсл тшппук he lost his right ball when he nutted into 3 year old and awakened 2% of his true diddling potential
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
Should probably go on the Profile Deletion Requests Thread instead
 
GunshyFever said:
vsbattles.fandom.com

Jeffrey Epstein

9c||high 6c with his private island||high 1a+ with absolute diddling potential he likes to swing his big sausage at kids he is infriends with trump агсл тшппук he lost his right ball when he nutted into 3 year old and awakened 2% of his true diddling potential
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
Banned the user, someone else already deleted the page.
 
Oiguana2701 said:
I believe that many of the additions he made would require a CRT. For example:
  • He added “but is unconfirmed in the movies” to the Telepathy section.
  • He added long walls of text to Thomas’ Powers & Abilities section without providing scans to all of them.
  • He added numerous YouTube video links. However, these videos are often taken down. It would be preferable to upload the relevant scenes directly to the wiki instead.
  • In the Striking Strength section, he added (Same feats as listed under Attack Potency), which is redundant.
  • He replaced this short reference that linked to a calculation: ''It would yield this much energy'', with this lengthy explanation: ''According to some calculations, Thomas withstood 26–41 G-forces…'', which is unnecessary and should remain concise.
  • He added Thomas’ immune system under Durability, stating that it recovered from injuries quickly (e.g., a gunshot wound healing after a few days). This seems more appropriate for Regeneration or Healing and would still require justification.
  • He added a very large wall of text to the Weaknesses section, which should also require a CRT.
Overall, many of these edits aren't minor clarifications and should be discussed and approved through the CRT process first. At the very least, the verse supporters should have been notified beforehand.
Click to expand...
Okay. What about the initial summary, and the explanations added to the range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections? 🙏
 
Kaydee1648 said:

User replaced all statistics with 9-C, which is concerning. It’s also noteworthy that the profile itself is poorly made; for example, its attack potency does not mirror its displayed tier, and it lacks tier templates as well as scans and references. Would it be fine to delete the profile?
Click to expand...
Borirak was the one who (cluelessly) messed up the page in question:


The edit that you linked to here was by another member who clumsily attempted to undo the vandalism. 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
Borirak was the one who (cluelessly) messed up the page in question:


The edit that you linked to here was by another member who clumsily attempted to undo the vandalism. 🙏
Click to expand...
@Kaydee1648

You can investigate/compare individual edits via history sections:

Kaydee1648 said:
What should we do about the profile itself?
Click to expand...
Well, it apparently currently contains quite a lot of references and either self-evident or uncontroversial statistics. 🙏
 
TWILIGHT-OP said:
@Bernkastelll could you please fix the profile.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Well, it apparently currently contains quite a lot of references and either self-evident or uncontroversial statistics. 🙏
Click to expand...
I've made some CRTs (and another user who was helping me made some CRTs as well) but it got stuck into a thread where nobody ever came to accept or reject XD, and yeah, there's a lot of references
 
Bernkastelll said:
I've made some CRTs (and another user who was helping me made some CRTs as well) but it got stuck into a thread where nobody ever came to accept or reject XD, and yeah, there's a lot of references
Click to expand...
As for the content of the abilities, most of them are indeed self-evident, but a few ones like Conceptual Manipulation were kinda tricky to evaluate because the series is complex so we made CRTs regarding that topic
 
Antvasima said:
Okay. What about the initial summary, and the explanations added to the range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections? 🙏
Click to expand...
Sorry for the late response. I'm not very familiar with the Maze Runner verse, so I can’t say whether the updates are correct or not. I’d recommend asking a knowledgeable member or a supporter of the verse to be sure.
 
Ztesrxgdfjcvgkbh said:
I would like to report Clousure for making several unconventional edits to Thomas’ profile. These include adding unnecessary uppercase text to the Level section, inserting excessive amounts of text, creating reference issues, adding new weaknesses, and placing the page in the Blog Posts category, among other changes. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Thomas_(Maze_Runner)?curid=3259579&diff=9357941&oldid=8757791
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
I think that a part of those changes seem like constructive improvements, especially the explanations added to the summary, powers and abilities, range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections. Previously they were extremely lacking and empty.

Is it acceptable if I restore that information? I add my personal retroactive acceptance for those additions if that is sufficient, as they seem self-evident and uncontroversial. 🙏
Click to expand...
Oiguana2701 said:
I believe that many of the additions he made would require a CRT. For example:
  • He added “but is unconfirmed in the movies” to the Telepathy section.
  • He added long walls of text to Thomas’ Powers & Abilities section without providing scans to all of them.
  • He added numerous YouTube video links. However, these videos are often taken down. It would be preferable to upload the relevant scenes directly to the wiki instead.
  • In the Striking Strength section, he added (Same feats as listed under Attack Potency), which is redundant.
  • He replaced this short reference that linked to a calculation: ''It would yield this much energy'', with this lengthy explanation: ''According to some calculations, Thomas withstood 26–41 G-forces…'', which is unnecessary and should remain concise.
  • He added Thomas’ immune system under Durability, stating that it recovered from injuries quickly (e.g., a gunshot wound healing after a few days). This seems more appropriate for Regeneration or Healing and would still require justification.
  • He added a very large wall of text to the Weaknesses section, which should also require a CRT.
Overall, many of these edits aren't minor clarifications and should be discussed and approved through the CRT process first. At the very least, the verse supporters should have been notified beforehand.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Okay. What about the initial summary, and the explanations added to the range, intelligence, and weaknesses sections? 🙏
Click to expand...
Oiguana2701 said:
Sorry for the late response. I'm not very familiar with the Maze Runner verse, so I can’t say whether the updates are correct or not. I’d recommend asking a knowledgeable member or a supporter of the verse to be sure.
Click to expand...
@Apex_Predator_GX @Kiryu-MG3
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
I will be mostly absent for a while
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
  • Locked
Controversial Powers on New Pages - Editing Rules Tweak
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Just a Random Butler
  • Locked
Proposal to Disallow the Use of Google Docs/Drive and Similar Services for Scans and Evidence Hosting
Replies
30
Views
3K
Just a Random Butler
Just a Random Butler
Back
Top