• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Jinx666 used my temp ban as an opportunity to randomly delete a picture from Elio's page.
Yeah, no

Its Masters EX content, which hasn't been discussed for Protagonists (let alone any other character) before trying to play it off as canon (especially when its just an outfit thats not present in the mainline)

Theres also a thread ongoing regarding the validity of how we treat Pokemon Protagonist profiles regardless, which Elio is involved in.
 
ladies, ladies, handbags down.

Sean, you should make a thread to add Masters EX stuff

Jinx, you need to go through the proper channels to remove images like that, just to be able to say "Staff approved it, lol."
 
Yeah, no

Its Masters EX content, which hasn't been discussed for Protagonists (let alone any other character) before trying to play it off as canon (especially when its just an outfit thats not present in the mainline)

Theres also a thread ongoing regarding the validity of how we treat Pokemon Protagonist profiles regardless, which Elio is involved in.
Yes it has, and I just made it canon. I literally got it to secondary canon on the site and everyone treats it that way now but you. Even if that wasn't the case, you're vandalizing profiles over a picture of an outfit.

Are you talking about the one where you tried to split the canons again and noncanonize everything optional based on nothing but vibes and we all figured it out immediately?
 
ladies, ladies, handbags down.

Sean, you should make a thread to add Masters EX stuff

Jinx, you need to go through the proper channels to remove images like that, just to be able to say "Staff approved it, lol."
I am and I added nothing from Masters except the picture, but I guess you needed something to say to both of us.
 
Jinx, you need to go through the proper channels to remove images like that, just to be able to say "Staff approved it, lol."
No, i dont. The CRT outcome of the thread, no matter how much Sean wants to deny it, has said that Masters EX content needs to be discussed before its added. Thats authority enough to remove minor tidbits that relate to the game. Its not just outright 'secondary canon' since that doesnt mean just one thing. It doesnt help that it takes ages to get things sorted on this site that only drags the issue further.

The picture was also added AFTER the thread was concluded. And it was literally the only thing i removed from the edit, so that the perception that the page is including Masters EX content on something undiscussed wasnt there. I sure as hell wasnt chipping in with anything minor and fixable while Sean was already being potently discussed before his ban.

I'm not making this a big thing again or anything, and id appreciate if it wasnt you trying to minimod in anything regarding me, but please stop trying to stir and ragebait
 
I'm not going to dignify that accusation with a legit response.

You know how Sean works, just go through the channels for the love of Sigmar, it makes it so much easier.
 
No, i dont. The CRT outcome of the thread, no matter how much Sean wants to deny it, has said that Masters EX content needs to be discussed before its added. Thats authority enough to remove minor tidbits that relate to the game. Its not just outright 'secondary canon' since that doesnt mean just one thing. It doesnt help that it takes ages to get things sorted on this site that only drags the issue further.
No, the outcome of the thread was that 11 people agreed to canonize Pokemon Masters. And CRTs aren't needed to add pictures, whole Galleries can be added without a feather ruffled.
The picture was also added AFTER the thread was concluded. And it was literally the only thing i removed from the edit, so that the perception that the page is including Masters EX content on something undiscussed wasnt there. I sure as hell wasnt chipping in with anything minor and fixable while Sean was already being potently discussed before his ban.
Yes, I sure did wait for Masters to be canonized.
I'm not making this a big thing again or anything, and id appreciate if it wasnt you trying to minimod in anything regarding me, but please stop trying to stir and ragebait
You just did, and it's not wrong to point it out.
 
@Jinx666 @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
Both of you please step back for a second.

Reaper is correct. While profile images are a minor issue, Sean needs to make threads about adding any specific Masters content to pages, and while Jinx technically can remove these things as they're unapproved, it'd be greatly appreciated if Jinx reported these things as unapproved edits. That way we can fix things up officially without any of these vandalism arguments taking place.
 
That way we can fix things up officially without any of these vandalism arguments taking place.
Sean would report me for any edit that does this regardless. I dont know how long people are gonna keep humouring him. Its one thing being passionate about a verse...

I wasnt gonna report a guy who was already on a month ban over something that i wouldnt even consider vandalism.

You know how Sean works, just go through the channels for the love of Sigmar, it makes it so much easier.
Literally nothing is easier with this forum's approach than just removing a tidbit of content directly that there is already authority in doing, it just prolongs things and causes more opportunities for Sean to jump. Everything takes ages to pass and i'm under no real obligation or need to be documenting this member to the point im marking down minute detail about their edits. I'm not a mod (or a mini-mod).
 
Last edited:
Sean would report me for any edit that does this regardless. I dont know how long people are gonna keep humouring him. Its one thing being passionate about a verse...
If you need to remove something, it's best to discuss it somewhere, even if it's just in the Pokemon discussion thread. You can also reach out to me or Imaginym and we can figure things out.
Literally nothing is easier with this forum's approach than just removing a tidbit of content directly that there is already authority in doing, it just prolongs things and causes more opportunities for Sean to jump. Everything takes ages to pass and i'm under no real obligation or need to be documenting this member to the point im marking down minute detail about their edits. I'm not a mod (or a mini-mod).
The problem is that if people just remove each other's edits it makes it hard to figure out. Technically an image is too minor to call vandalism, but regardless if something needs to be removed it should be discussed first. It shouldn't be added when it's questionable and it also shouldn't be removed without approval. This stuff all should be discussed first.
 
I didnt even remove the edit. I got rid of just the Masters EX outfit as one of the main pictures (not even in one of those unnecessary galleries), and even added a note to the edit that explained my reasoning on removing it. Which is what those are for and are easily accessible from the Edit History menu. None of the other content he added to the actual text was even changed.
I actively made and regularly bump CRT (that isnt getting sufficient staff input anyway so like many things on the wiki its staying stagnant) directly related to setting a standard for the pages like this, so its not like im not following the rules even if i dont agree with the efficiency. Having to continue to discuss about things that have already had a recent CRT conclusion on (and will further cause minor arguments such as this since Sean will report me for breathing the same air as him) just makes it excessive.

But its w/e, im gonna unwatch for my own sake. Just please keep in mind that Sean has only just come back and is restarting all of this, and in my case, on his own gumption.
 
So what do our staff members think that we should do here? 🙏
 
I didnt even remove the edit. I got rid of just the Masters EX outfit as one of the main pictures (not even in one of those unnecessary galleries), and even added a note to the edit that explained my reasoning on removing it. Which is what those are for and are easily accessible from the Edit History menu. None of the other content he added to the actual text was even changed.
I actively made and regularly bump CRT (that isnt getting sufficient staff input anyway so like many things on the wiki its staying stagnant) directly related to setting a standard for the pages like this, so its not like im not following the rules even if i dont agree with the efficiency. Having to continue to discuss about things that have already had a recent CRT conclusion on (and will further cause minor arguments such as this since Sean will report me for breathing the same air as him) just makes it excessive.
It's minor, but it still should be discussed in some way. Others may think differently on this.
But its w/e, im gonna unwatch for my own sake. Just please keep in mind that Sean has only just come back and is restarting all of this, and in my case, on his own gumption.
It is best if you two avoid each other. Ironically it'd be even better if you two could discuss things like this between you and agree on it, but oh well.

Anyway, I suggest both of you move on and we keep the image removed, and both of you get a reminder to go through proper channels for things, minor as this one thankfully is.
 
I blocked them. 🙏
It's minor, but it still should be discussed in some way. Others may think differently on this.

It is best if you two avoid each other. Ironically it'd be even better if you two could discuss things like this between you and agree on it, but oh well.

Anyway, I suggest both of you move on and we keep the image removed, and both of you get a reminder to go through proper channels for things, minor as this one thankfully is.
I am fine with Random's conclusions here. 🙏
 
I don't think this was approved
 
I don't think this was approved
They nuked the page but the user brought it again.
 
Last edited:
Those seem like extremely self-evident changes, so I think that I alone am sufficient to retroactively approve them.

We should still give an instruction message to avoid similar unapproved edit in the future though. 🙏
 
Back
Top