• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

No problem. Just learn for the future please. 🙏
 
Yeah and there's no way they know for sure that's Class 5 without a calc, should just be "Superhuman" for the lack of a better solution.
 
That is a very minor and somewhat self-evident edit made by an (I think) well-behaved member, so I think that only an instruction message is necessary rather than a warning. 🙏
 
Twilight handled it. 🙏
 
Idk who upgraded Aris to 2A but someone did there was no crt that accepted her getting pass low 6B at all if someone can please fix this
 
@Dragopentling you made the changes, if you'd like to elaborate; you had previously reinstated the changes, I'd like to know if there was a CRT establishing this tier.
Yo. A bit awkward to come here, but, uh... I also reported Dragopentling to Ant for this same issue more than a few months ago, although, it was a more minor issue of just adding NPI to profiles. I got rid of it through here, but apparently Dragopentling re-added it back during April while I was taking a break from the forums.

I'm just stating all of this to prove they have a history of adding things to profile w/o CRTs. This can be fully shown through the Contributions section of their VBW profile, btw.
 
Yo. A bit awkward to come here, but, uh... I also reported Dragopentling to Ant for this same issue more than a few months ago, although, it was a more minor issue of just adding NPI to profiles. I got rid of it through here, but apparently Dragopentling re-added it back during April while I was taking a break from the forums.

I'm just stating all of this to prove they have a history of adding things to profile w/o CRTs. This can be fully shown through the Contributions section of their VBW profile, btw.
He's done this before damn
 
Yo. A bit awkward to come here, but, uh... I also reported Dragopentling to Ant for this same issue more than a few months ago, although, it was a more minor issue of just adding NPI to profiles. I got rid of it through here, but apparently Dragopentling re-added it back during April while I was taking a break from the forums.

I'm just stating all of this to prove they have a history of adding things to profile w/o CRTs. This can be fully shown through the Contributions section of their VBW profile, btw.
They claim that their changes are "so blatant and straightforward that a CRT is just extended redundancy", what should we do with this user?
 
They claim that their changes are "so blatant and straightforward that a CRT is just extended redundancy", what should we do with this user?
It's been brought up to them, and they've been warned by staff about it (though this failed to make it to the Warning Tracker, I note); in this case, I would consider it knowledgeable, repeated vandalism. Back then, he was told, fairly gently, that we have a reason for these processes and that even under ideal considerations from him, things need to go through the Process we have enacted to ensure a level of quality control.

For now, I would consider a short ban a reasonable response, to the order of two weeks or so. Our rules are concrete but there is good cause for frustration; bureaucracy is efficient but terribly annoying to work with, especially spread so thin. Nevertheless, it is how we do things, and edits cannot be made for being "obvious", as judged by a single user. I won't enact any action just yet, as I would like to hear from Dragopentling themselves, to see if they have any nuance to mention in this case that has not been discussed.
 
It's been brought up to them, and they've been warned by staff about it (though this failed to make it to the Warning Tracker, I note); in this case, I would consider it knowledgeable, repeated vandalism. Back then, he was told, fairly gently, that we have a reason for these processes and that even under ideal considerations from him, things need to go through the Process we have enacted to ensure a level of quality control.

For now, I would consider a short ban a reasonable response, to the order of two weeks or so. Our rules are concrete but there is good cause for frustration; bureaucracy is efficient but terribly annoying to work with, especially spread so thin. Nevertheless, it is how we do things, and edits cannot be made for being "obvious", as judged by a single user. I won't enact any action just yet, as I would like to hear from Dragopentling themselves, to see if they have any nuance to mention in this case that has not been discussed.
@Dragopentling
 
Could be wrong but idk.
 
Back
Top