• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

This user made major changes to the statistics of some DB(Toei) characters on the 26th of April. Seems like a new user so maybe he doesn't know the process.
 
This user made some edits to this profile without a CRT, although they were obviously not malicious edits. He just added a few abilities.

Edit: Now that I check, he has made edits to several pages of the verse without a CRT.
It seems like he mostly added links with evidence to powers without any listed explanations, so I think that we can probably make an exception in this case, but I left him an instruction message.

 
This user made major changes to the statistics of some DB(Toei) characters on the 26th of April. Seems like a new user so maybe he doesn't know the process.
I applied a 1 month block to their account, and GarrixianXD and I each gave a warning message.

 
hey uh just wondering can someone check the validity of this edit(cant embed because the device im using doesn't like me for whatever reason)

 
I gave them a warning message and a 1 month block.

Was a block necessary? They added quite some details to the article and provided an entire editing reason in a genuine matter, which doesn't make them look like a troll. They've only changed the statistics of an article once with no precedent warnings; a month block towards a new clueless member seems harsh.
 
hey uh just wondering can someone check the validity of this edit(cant embed because the device im using doesn't like me for whatever reason)

Ant?
 
It seems fine. 🙏

Btw: Is this your wiki account?

 
Well, maybe it should be reverted then. I may be too lenient regarding more limited and self-evident changes.
 


Cory himself would be disappointed
 
Bambu deleted that page, and I gave some instructions to the page creator. 🙏
 


Cory himself would be disappointed
Man is back and is Committed to the craft. lmao
 
The user @Jeeeeepil123 has made rampant changes to a profile they posted recently, Tyler Durden (Fight Club Comics), despite a lack of approval, and sometimes, despite users actively rejecting it.

They added this CRT and this CRT despite only one staff member having approved it.

They added this CRT despite it only being partially accepted by DDM, and rejected by Lephyr.

On top of that, they've frankly been spamming CRTs for the character; all these threads, and multiple more were posted in the past few days.

On top of that, from the brief glimpse I've had, many of these claims seem extremely suspect, taking things vastly out of context to ludicrous extents for potent abilities that we typically only hand out very carefully.

And lastly, the page is generally so low-quality, with woefully inadequate justifications and scans, a complete absence of references, a flurry of spelling/grammar errors, with a few formatting errors to boot, that I think it may just be worth deleting.
 
Wait, isn't “un-controversial” task only acquire one staff approval? Or am i missing something?
They added this CRT despite it only being partially accepted by DDM, and rejected by Lephyr.
Lephyr disagreed at first, which i tried to find to solve the problem on lowering the tier to High 6-A like they just said earlier.
And he responds a suggestion that 7-A is more likely applicable, which i literally followed what he said... am i wrong?
On top of that, they've frankly been spamming CRTs for the character; all these threads, and multiple more were posted in the past few days.
Is posting like that not allowed? Sorry, i didn't know... my apologies🙏
On top of that, from the brief glimpse I've had, many of these claims seem extremely suspect, taking things vastly out of context to ludicrous extents for potent abilities that we typically only hand out very carefully.
I do not take the scans out of context, also the comic is very confusing... i observe each of them to make it more understable as much as possible (i failed, don't i?), i'm sorry if i'm wrong tho.
And lastly, the page is generally so low-quality, with woefully inadequate justifications and scans, a complete absence of references, a flurry of spelling/grammar errors, with a few formatting errors to bo
I can clean it with spell-checking grammar, i also tried to ask people (specifically in fight club thread) to clean the profile but it seems like nobody want to do it.
As for reference, to be honest... i just don't understand how it works (my device is also very laggy, which is why i kinda simplified the profile to make it fit into my phone... sorry, if its really delete-able then i can understand that decision)
 
They added this CRT and this CRT despite only one staff member having approved it.
Yeah, my input alone shouldn't be enough and I think a rule of thumb is preferably at least three staff who are Discussion Mods or above. Especially since the 2nd one I outright said it's preferable to have more staff look at it and only thought one part of it not the other was alright.
They added this CRT despite it only being partially accepted by DDM, and rejected by Lephyr.
I never really gave an official acceptance or rejection, but simply a clarification. But I more so agree with Lephyr looking at their posts though I never specified after that.
 
So how do the Fight Club pages currently need to be revised based on this?
 
Yeah, my input alone shouldn't be enough and I think a rule of thumb is preferably at least three staff who are Discussion Mods or above.
three staff? Isn't that only for “well-known” or popular verses? The one that i discuss barely reach any attention from people... i just know that it only need one-two staff, three is supposed to be a “controversial” thread handling...
If i'm in wrong position, then i am okay with every decision you guys will do.

One thing that i need to say, the scan that i gave is full context (every panel that i put is well chronologically)
 
Back
Top