Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I removed the categories from your sandbox page:And now for something a little different, a page undeletion request. I don't know how he did it, but I guess tllm managed to delete a page without looking at it, because unlike the rest of the verse, Plutonian was actually fine because I touched it up a while ago. I've rehosted it here. Besides red links which would not have existed at the time of deletion, this page doesn't really have anything that would stop it from being reinstated.
Agreed.I mean the page as is is acceptable, doesn't have many scans but it's got calcs for all feats and a decent amount of work put into it. Feel free to revise it but it can stay in its current state.
Anyways since this has been up for several days am I good to nuke this?9-A lacks a calc and tier 8 ratings are based on a calc that was not approved![]()
Blood Lad
For detailed information about this series, visit the Blood Lad Wiki Blood Lad is a manga seires created by Yuuki Kodama and serialized in Young Ace. The series follows Staz C. Blood, a vampire and territory leader, as he attempts to revive Yanagi Fuyumi after her untimely death in the demon...vsbattles.fandom.com
Speed and LS is just "Superhuman" without any good reasoning and seems really lazy, lacks scans and so on
@ApiesDeathbyLazors can further comment here
@Sir_OvensKnack (Verse)
Oven's the only supporter, I told him that we were considering deletion, he asked why, I told him the reasons (well, the first two of these) and he didn't respond. Those reasons are:
- Every single page scales to a 7-B rating. This is based on a standard calc of busting a mountain but from the video of the feat it's visually much smaller than the 600m needed for that standard calc (it looks more like 200m to my quick pixel-scaling).
- Has a character (which isn't linked on a verse page) who has Large Size (Type 3); that requires being over a kilometer tall compares its size to a monastery in this clip, where it looks to be more like 150m tall (backed up by the earlier scene where it looks to be slightly smaller than the mountain it blew up).
- This is less important, but it provided no scans or reasoning for Mid-High regen for this character.
If you pixel scaled it then why not just make a calc dude, you're halfway there already. Just do tree size, worst case scenario lowball it.Every single page scales to a 7-B rating. This is based on a standard calc of busting a mountain but from the video of the feat it's visually much smaller than the 600m needed for that standard calc (it looks more like 200m to my quick pixel-scaling).
Wow, a tertiary character has a slightly wrong ability, truly a good reason for verse deletion.Has a character (which isn't linked on a verse page) who has Large Size (Type 3); that requires being over a kilometer tall compares its size to a monastery in this clip, where it looks to be more like 150m tall (backed up by the earlier scene where it looks to be slightly smaller than the mountain it blew up).
As above.This is less important, but it provided no scans or reasoning for Mid-High regen for this character.
They have still not responded to this thread in several days after being pinged, if their last actual activity on the forum was a month ago I feel like they won't do muchApiesDeathbyLazors last visited here on Friday last week, so I am not certain.
I will note that the verse has 4 profiles, so imo glaring ability issues are in fact a rather big issueWow, a tertiary character has a slightly wrong ability, truly a good reason for verse deletion.
As above.
No, that's too much of a lowball, those look like firs which range from 10 to 80 meters.If you want me to lowball it, then fine, just the peak + 5m tree has the destroyed section be 20m high, that gives 2.24e11 Joules, 8-B, should I make a blog for that?
"Glaring ability issues" is not how I'd describe not elaborating on stuff or making minor mistakes.I will note that the verse has 4 profiles, so imo glaring ability issues are in fact a rather big issue
If none supporters can point out the issues rather easily I would calling it glaring"Glaring ability issues" is not how I'd describe not elaborating on stuff or making minor mistakes.
If nothing is done about it yesAre you seriously deleting shit over this?
I wouldn't, cause one is easily fixed and the other is probably not even wrong.If none supporters can point out the issues rather easily I would calling it glaring
Cool, you're wrong about it and I will continue to oppose it.If nothing is done about it yes
CoolCool, you're wrong about it and I will continue to oppose it.
Anyways Blood Lad, can I delete it?Anyways since this has been up for several days am I good to nuke this?
I think that we should wait a bit longer for @ApiesDeathbyLazors first.Anyways Blood Lad, can I delete it?