Yes that is proof for THEIR Universe. So we are using proof from other works of fiction to say that yes this characters universe definitely has a soul. That is incredibly fallacious and wrong.
No this is again incredibly fallacious and wrong. You cannot say bc this verse has souls the other verse has souls. Especially when there’s no proof whatsoever for or against it.
Now you're just strawmanning us and stonewalling.
There is nothing to prove or disprove. The verse said nothing. There isn’t anything to base anything off of. The opposing verse says they have souls the other says nothing on the subject once so ever and can’t be proven to have or not have them. Meaning the one that has a tangible claim with nothing to stop that claim would get priority because we know souls for them are real while there is no profile against them with the other opponent. They have no protection, versus someone that absolutely has the power.
this was nowhere solved, and how is it unfairly lmfao?
Lmfao, stonewalling and strawmanning? Since when? I am not the one with baseless claims
This. Bern, there's nothing you can do here without being unfair to one type of verse or another.
This isn’t strawmanning though, the argument just makes sense. Many verses having a certain concept not proved IRL doesn’t mean all verses should
There is, since, thats a literally unproved shit, made up shit, you cannot prove that Mermaid exists, so, why are u assuming that mermaids exist in ALL OTHERS VERSES just because several verses does have it?
Nerfing =/= Unfair, because thats the accurate manner, said thing shouldnt even be assumed in first of place
People have souls because in their verse, they do, but thats not a thing in others verses, thats a unproved thing, different than atoms, so, soul is fantasy unless proved, and it obviously does not affect others verses that doesnt have souls there
It was stomping the other verses unfairly while every person arguing for it was committing a fallacy.
if it stomps verses because of its power, it is not unfair
If u dont like the thread, just leave it
I am not enforcing, this is not even a CRT, this is a question and answer boards, where people can question the standards if they want to
the answers be like ''because we assume they do'', funny.
That is the only answer. Sorry.
This is an online internet forum- if the people want it, the people will have it. The same goes for not wanting it.
pretty bad to a site that claims to want accurate stuff
What they say to me doesnt matter
Let me use proper wording, I am debating the topic, yeah, but I do not want to change the standard, as this is not a CRT, this is what I mean, are u happy now?
Sometimes you can't find one answer, you have to compromise.
Look, having a soul is a positive. You have to prove a positive, not a negative
So you don't care about what others say? What is the meaning of this then? Close this thread.
I said that I don't care if the others says that I am wrong, as we are debating the topic, argument is what matter, not what they think about mine
actually magic doesn't exist in the other guys setting so he is immune to it, but that doesn't matter because it wouldn't work in the first place
Technically Bern’s point isn’t that solid as it is already a claim to being made unto itself and is subjective, not objectively as treating as if it is a fact doesn’t make it necessarily right per se ngl.
Eh one character stomping another bc a fictional belief isn’t shown to be in their universe isn’t all that fun to be but eh
I am not treating it as fact, actually, the ones treating Souls Existing as assumption are the ones
Can u guys please stop talking about ''but verses matches tho''? it does not justify a baseless claim
