Where the hell are the High 1-A+ types?

[JimedBro2020]

I've been scrolling the forums for a while and stumbled upon an idea y'all keep on saying:

• High 1-A+ Type l
• High 1-A+ Type ll

According to what y'all have been saying, type l encompasses the set of all logically possible worlds while type ll encompasses even more worlds beyond classical logic, encompassing even illogic and impossible worlds. Now I just gotta say, where the hell is this?

I looked at the tiering system and nothing, why isn't this info in the tiering system yet? It could honestly calm down some rage people have about this wiki's "possible worlds" tiering

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

According to what y'all have been saying, type l encompasses the set of all logically possible worlds while type ll encompasses even more worlds beyond classical logic, encompassing even illogic and impossible worlds. Now I just gotta say, where the hell is this?

The distinction is made on this part, from the Tiering System page:

That said, characters who embody the framework of all possible worlds properly speaking may be rightly considered more powerful than those that can simply create arbitrarily big possible worlds while nevertheless existing in one.

"Type 1 and Type 2" is how users informally refer to this distinction.

Type 1 = Characters who can create/destroy/manipulate the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds

Type 2 = Characters who embody the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

The distinction is made on this part, from the Tiering System page:


"Type 1 and Type 2" is how users informally refer to this distinction.

Type 1 = Characters who can create/destroy/manipulate the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds

Type 2 = Characters who embody the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds.

Huh. Didn't know you became a Moderator. Congrats.
Wait What's the difference between creating/manipulating all possible/impossible worlds and embodying them ?

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Wait What's the difference between creating/manipulating all possible/impossible worlds and embodying them ?

The former would be the case of a character that is nevertheless still part of one of those worlds but can manipulate the set of said worlds (like for example, a 10-B with High 1-A+ hax), while the latter would be the case of a character who is the High 1-A+ multiverse itself.

 

[Exoko]

The former would be the case of a character that is nevertheless still part of one of those worlds but can manipulate the set of said worlds (like for example, a 10-B with High 1-A+ hax), while the latter would be the case of a character who is the High 1-A+ multiverse itself.

Does what they embody have to include 1A constructs?

 

[ArgentDragonPluto]

Does what they embody have to include 1A constructs?

They are inherently included. They are quite literally meant as 'all possible worlds'. Basically, at this point, cosmology is irrelevant.

If a character perfectly meets the definition of possible worlds but doesn't have explicit qualitative and meta-qualitative stuff, they will be High 1-A+ off of the description, similar to how a Tier 0 can exist in a verse that has a 3-A universe since what matters is who they are.

At least, I'm pretty sure that's how it's treated. I don't know 100%.

Spoiler

 

[DeathxMoonZ]

The distinction is made on this part, from the Tiering System page:


"Type 1 and Type 2" is how users informally refer to this distinction.

Type 1 = Characters who can create/destroy/manipulate the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds

Type 2 = Characters who embody the set of all logically possible (or impossible) worlds.

Yo i have a quick question regarding High 1-A+ type 1. So let’s say a cosmology has all (im)possible worlds right? Now lets use character A for example, character A is in all those worlds or one, now would it be possible for character A to be able to manipulate all those worlds including the impossible ones and now in all those worlds, character A is the same in all those worlds. In short terms character A manipulated or influenced all those worlds so that in all those worlds he or she is the same in them all.