Where do we draw the line between unquantified space-time hax and High 3-A?

[Yobo_Blue]

So, I'm a bit confused on this, it seems like the two are often interchangeable, at least in definition, so what's the difference?

 

[The_Everlasting]

High 3-A needs to happen on a significant-but-less-than-universal scale.

Unquantifiable space-time hax would be like erasing the space-time on Earth.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

So, say, a Solar System's space-time would be High 3-A?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Implying a solar system is anywhere near significant to an entire universe.

A whole galaxy wouldn't be High 3-A.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

So, what exactly would be High 3-A?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Like, blowing up whole chunks of a universe's space-time. Something you can say is a significant part of a universe. Which means high end 3-B or something.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

What about erasing portions of timelines, since that's a thing?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Probably High 3-A.

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

^

 

[Endless_Astrograph_Sorcerer]

I think it's a bit weird to auto-exclude something like spacetime erasure on a galactic scale from being a High 3-A feat. I understand why the overwhelming majority of lower scale time space feats cant be considered AP (just having spacetime hax would automatically put one above infinite 3D AP otherwise) but by the time you're dealing with anything on a galactic scale or above really, it's evident that you're not looking at simple localized spacetime hax

Of course galactic scale isn't even a meaningful % of universal scale. I don't know what the standard should be really but the language for High 3-A on the Tiering System is very open ended with room for interpretation so I'd think this is an important debate

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Last I checked, Diavolo has High 3-A for erasing just 10 seconds, but it's 10 seconds of the entire universe.

Edit: Or at least GER is High 3-A for nullifying something that erased 10 seconds across the entire universe.