• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

What Time Travel Paradox is this?

Messages
2,098
Reaction score
1,540
Consider a time-travel scenario where three characters travel from the future to the past. All three originate from a future that already exists and requires each of them to have lived long enough to reach the point of time travel. While in the past, one of the three characters (the adult time traveler) dies, while the remaining two survive and later return to the future.

The character who dies in the past is the same individual who had already lived to adulthood and initiated the time travel; no younger version of that character is directly targeted. Despite this, the death does not retroactively erase the causal chain that produced that character up to the moment of time travel, and the surviving travelers return to a future that remains internally consistent with the altered past.


Questions

1. Which future do the surviving travelers return to: the original future, or one consistent with the altered past?

2. How is paradox erasure avoided, given that the character both reaches time travel and later dies in the past?

3. Is this outcome explained purely by timeline branching, or by the failure of paradox erasure affecting the character’s origin?

4. Under VSBW standards, if a past death does not retroactively erase the causal chain that produced a character, does that qualify as Type 1 (time-paradox immunity), regardless of survival?
 
Consider a time-travel scenario where three characters travel from the future to the past. All three originate from a future that already exists and requires each of them to have lived long enough to reach the point of time travel. While in the past, one of the three characters (the adult time traveler) dies, while the remaining two survive and later return to the future.

The character who dies in the past is the same individual who had already lived to adulthood and initiated the time travel; no younger version of that character is directly targeted. Despite this, the death does not retroactively erase the causal chain that produced that character up to the moment of time travel, and the surviving travelers return to a future that remains internally consistent with the altered past.


Questions

1. Which future do the surviving travelers return to: the original future, or one consistent with the altered past?

2. How is paradox erasure avoided, given that the character both reaches time travel and later dies in the past?

3. Is this outcome explained purely by timeline branching, or by the failure of paradox erasure affecting the character’s origin?

4. Under VSBW standards, if a past death does not retroactively erase the causal chain that produced a character, does that qualify as Type 1 (time-paradox immunity), regardless of survival?
So, let me get this straight

The character A who dies just dies in the past and his future self isn't effected. The two who live and return to the future find A living as normal UNTIL he time travels (as he should have) or does he not time travel this time and continues existing as if he never time travelled or died?
 
So, let me get this straight

The character A who dies just dies in the past and his future self isn't effected. The two who live and return to the future find A living as normal UNTIL he time travels (as he should have) or does he not time travel this time and continues existing as if he never time travelled or died?
If he's saying what we talked about before here's basically what he's describing:

30 year old Joe travels 20 years to the past. Adult Joe dies in the past without having interacted with his kid self in any way shape or form.

Samlex1234 believes this somehow causes a paradox and the questions he laid down are about it.
 
Back
Top