What tier cosmology is this?

[Kflare63]

So one universe is described as having infinite parallel universes (like two mirrors facing eachother and having an infinite reflection) and there are infinite of these universes. what tier would this cosmology be and what tier would a character be if they destroyed one of these "universes"?

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

So one universe is described as having infinite parallel universes (like two mirrors facing eachother and having an infinite reflection) and there are infinite of these universes. what tier would this cosmology be and what tier would a character be if they destroyed one of these "universes"?

2-A, since it's just Infinity*Infinity. If they were layered with superiority then it would be High 1-B.

 

[Lormac_CC]

2-A

 

[Sus]

2A

 

[Kflare63]

Forgot to mention that each parallel universe is in fact a low 2-C structure

 

[Sus]

Forgot to mention that each parallel universe is in fact a low 2-C structure

2A

 

[Planck69]

Baseline 2-A.

 

[Quantu]

No layered transcendence here, At most two infinities into 2-A.

A lot of the time statements on Multiverse layouts are useless without a thorough understanding of the whole cosmology (which likely won't be explained by a single panel)

 

[Planck69]

No layered transcendence here, At most two infinities into 2-A.

A lot of the time statements on Multiverse layouts are useless without a thorough understanding of the whole cosmology (which likely won't be explained by a single panel)

There's no such thing as moving into 2-A via cosmologies anymore.

 

[Quantu]

So then it's literally baseline 2-A?

 

[Delta333]

So then it's literally baseline 2-A?

yes

 

[Kflare63]

Thank you

 

[Cat275]

So one universe is described as having infinite parallel universes (like two mirrors facing eachother and having an infinite reflection) and there are infinite of these universes. what tier would this cosmology be and what tier would a character be if they destroyed one of these "universes"?

Shouldn't it be considered 2 layers to 2a
Or is it only baseline?
(Am i missing something?)

 

[Sus]

Shouldn't it be considered 2 layers to 2a
Or is it only baseline?
(Am i missing something?)

Baseline
Infinite + Infinite = still Infinite

 

[Cat275]

Baseline
Infinite + Infinite = still Infinite

I see, i got confused a little since my friend said something like this would be 2 layers to 2a.

 

[Sus]

I see, i got confused a little since my friend said something like this would be 2 layers to 2a.

If adding to infinite would create a larger amount then that'd be only 1 layer above baseline tho

 

[Cat275]

If adding to infinite would create a larger amount then that'd be only 1 layer above baseline tho

Oh yeah, i guess.

 

[Kflare63]

Baseline
Infinite + Infinite = still Infinite

By that logic the only way to be above baseline is a scaling chain

 

[Planck69]

By that logic the only way to be above baseline is a scaling chain

I mean, yeah. Unless there's an extremely specific elaboration by a verse that's the general case here.

 

[Delta333]

Is this related to Precure?

 

[Kflare63]

You know what there's no point in being vague yes

 

[Delta333]

yea the verse is definitely 2-A, I can even argue it to be one of the strongest 2-A verses but the current profiles lack too much information that I don't think it's possible to update them (or I need to make the longest CRT that has ever existed)

 

[Kflare63]

yea the verse is definitely 2-A, I can even argue it to be one of the strongest 2-A verses but the current profiles lack too much information that I don't think it's possible to update them (or I need to make the longest CRT that has ever existed)

I'm already working on it but there are so few supporters that it will get pushed into CRT purgatory

 

[Sus]

By that logic the only way to be above baseline is a scaling chain

If the verse portrays destroying 2 sets of infinite universes as more powerful than destroying 1, it counts (that's a rule here, i usually ignore it tho)