@Fire Let's walk back through the argument again.
You: Medaka wins and the reason given is because she's the hero.
Me: She wins but another explanation is always given, there's never a fight where it's said to be because she's a hero.
You: Ajimu tried fighting against every hero and lost.
Me: We only know that she only fought against Iihiko, who won for non-plot reasons.
You: Ajimu said she couldn't win against Iihiko for the same reason she couldn't win against Medaka, but Medaka doesn't have a "im immune" ability.
Firstly, this doesn't actually show a time when Medaka or any character won because she's the hero, it's just a flashback to the earlier statement when Iihiko's introduced. This is what I called you out on and what you responded to. Secondly, Ajimu never
failed to win against Medaka, she never
tried to win against Medaka.
I agree that Medaka has no logical reason to be able to beat Ajimu, but we've never seen her do so, I've agreed with this since my first post in this thread. Bringing up Iihiko doesn't add anything to this, since he has a logical reason to win and was fought against, while Medaka doesn't and was never fought against.
My point is that you're misrepresenting things by saying that "Medaka won a fight and the explanation was given that she won because she was the hero", even though that never happened. That's my point, please stick to discussing it.
That's strictly to the future. She doesn't want to spoil the future of the story (as she says "don't want to turn the page"). The present and past are different.
Ajimu didn't say she didn't want to turn the page,
the narrator said that
people in general don't want to turn the page to spoil novels. It's an analogy to experiences the reader has made by the narrator. It's not Ajimu saying that her omniscience only applies to the past.
Here's the sca for anyone to check out.