• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Void Termina Implication

ArbitraryNumbers

VS Battles
Retired
4,652
1,328
This is a minor thing, but I saw it mentioned in an upgrade thread that Void Termina was implied to be Kirby from the past or something. Where is the statement that implies this?
 
Many implied things in this verse is just people believing headcanons without solid evidence, this is that. There aren't statements.

The visual implications fro VT being a Dark Matter/predecessor of them are now undeniable tho.
 
One of VT's phases has Kirby's face and iirc it also has the same voice actor. More than VT being a Kirby, IMO is more likely that Kirby is some kind of very kind (my jokes suck like Kirby) Dark Matter or something. Maybe some kind of ancestor? Dunno
 
Yeah, Kirby is related to Void somehow, probably originated from Void or the same species, but really, the deliberate headcanon the majority of fans have of Void being Kirby from the past (kirb) or Zero REALLY PISSES ME OFF.
 
Back
Top