• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

NEP Nature and Void relation

490
174
So.... let's say there is something that is called a Void, and this void has an "energy", to be precise its called "negative energy"[-1].
Said energy and void erase anything that come into contact with it, and the void remains as long as the negative energy remains, or say, doesn't turn to true nothingness[0].

For context, in the verse, "energy" makes up non-physical things like concepts and souls. One of those concepts that "energy" makes is the concept of existence[literally].
And the energy of the void here is called NEGATIVE energy.

So, with this much context, can this "Void" and its "Negative energy" be taken as NEP1 in their essential nature?
Or well, a better question would be, would a "Void" with such a context be qualifiable for NEP1 in nature?
 
Back
Top