- 32,359
- 20,298
I am obviously with DarkDragonMedeus here.
(By the way, congratulations on your promotion, bro.)
(By the way, congratulations on your promotion, bro.)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tf are you taking about? The light and dark worlds are both seperate timelines. Warping a seperate space time is an obvious 3-A feat. Not to mention everyone's been saying shit like the Dark world isn't a universe because we don't know the size of sacred realm. And once again that is false because sacred realm could be the size of my left nut and it wouldn't matter at all, since no matter the size dark world will always be a universe made from an unknown realm.DarkDragonMedeus said:Dust Collector said ruling the Cosmos is a mistranslation and the source he linked also proves it. And simply ruling the world doesn't automatically mean you can oneshot the world. Matt and Azzy are both very busy people and have refuted this countless times. There isn't quite enough proof of Sacred Realm being universe sized, and it was also mentioned on another thread that Complete Triforce users were going to be downgraded from 4-B to at least High 4-C.
And actually, each of the three timelines contains, all the worlds/realms, ect. Light World, Sacred Realm, Termina, the various Oracle game places, ect are all contained inside a single timeline. Though the Golden Goddesses are still 2-C because it's implied they merged the three timelines into one prior to the events of Breath of the Wild. But still, there isn't enough proof for anyone being 3-A.
Hey I know your experience with Zelda threads is a bit rough just like mine has but I learned the best thing to do is keep an open mind and stay positive.ThanksGiverOfThePeace said:Sigh... I agree to 3-A. Now time to watch the fire.
Well coming from watching one of my fav shows finally hit a series finale, i'm kinda down in the dumps.Oblivion Lightning said:Hey I know your experience with Zelda threads is a bit rough just like mine has but I learned the best thing to do is keep an open mind and stay positive.ThanksGiverOfThePeace said:Sigh... I agree to 3-A. Now time to watch the fire.
No please reread the OP as there's 2 reasonings for the 3-A upgrade -The Cosmos stuff -Stuff Warren brought up and Sacred Realms and 3-A argumentTriforcePower1 said:@DDM Given that literally the only thing that was put in the OP is a mistranslation, I think the thread can be already closed.
How is the evidence lacking? The Light world is a seperate timeline which is mirrored by the dark world to be the exact same thing but darker. This shit is basic stuff, it's not like the entire game revolves aground it.HammerStrikes219 said:... All I seeing is speculation and conjuncture. The evidence is also lacking as well.
I agree with Dragon in this case.
UhhhHammerStrikes219 said:... All I seeing is speculation and conjuncture. The evidence is also lacking as well.
I agree with Dragon in this case.
DarkDragonMedeus said:Hyperbolic Time Chamber has its own space-time, but destroying it isn't Low 2-C. The Sacred Realm has only really shown Earth to Sun radius/distance; with diameter being 2 AU at bare minimum. So the Sacred realm is High 4-C at bare minimum. But the 4-B calc was considered iffy as we don't really use inverse square law for pocket reality feats anymore. Unless the Earth exploded with the edge of the explosion destroying the sun, 4-B isn't really applicable. We either need showings that Sacred Realm has multiple galaxies or something more specific rather than flowery language. Voice echoing across time and space is just flowery language. If it said transcends Space-Time or embodies Space-Time, it would be a different story.
Again Oblivion mentioned this,The Light World is Universe in size and the Dark World mirrors it so it's confirmed to be Universe in size saying other wise is absolutely false.Time and Space exist in the Sacred Realm so it's default to a Universal Continuum due to it's confirmed size and nothing contradicting it's size.ShadowWarrior1999 said:Having space-time isn't enough, even pocket dimensions have it. There needs to be at least some indication of it being universe sized, such as being stated to be one, supported by the context of a statement (ex. a world parallel to our own, alternate reality, etc.), or it's shown to contain stuff like a galaxy or a huge amount of stars.
Yes Kona should mind his tone as hostility isn't going to help anything and I do understand his frustration and I agree with 3-A Triforce but being hostile isn't gonna helpHammerStrikes219 said:@Kona You do not have to be rude though in this case.
If you decide to become more hostile, this thread will be closed without any resolution in this case.