- 3,493
- 1,360
So if you look at the Transduality page, you will see Plurality listed as type four and that it is something that it is "A state of being which is qualitatively beyond and superior to the nature of even the distinction between duality and transduality". And that's just not true. Plurality is not in anyway superior to transduality or duality for that matter. It is simply a different concept than dualism, or monism. That's like saying using Windows makes you superior to using Linux. They are different systems. Nothing less or nothing more.
None of the pages linked in Type 4 link to anything that proclaims plurality to be superior to transduality. They at most say that its is just a different concept to other two-value systems.
Type 4 sounds like a completely made up power that is using pluralism's name for some reason. Or Plurality is actually treated as something superior to dualism and transdualism but the source isn't posted.
Either Type 4 shouldn't exist or it should be called something else or there should be better sources to show that is generally understood to be superior to dualism and transdualism.
None of the pages linked in Type 4 link to anything that proclaims plurality to be superior to transduality. They at most say that its is just a different concept to other two-value systems.
Type 4 sounds like a completely made up power that is using pluralism's name for some reason. Or Plurality is actually treated as something superior to dualism and transdualism but the source isn't posted.
Either Type 4 shouldn't exist or it should be called something else or there should be better sources to show that is generally understood to be superior to dualism and transdualism.
