Transduality type 2 problem?

[Fixxed]

Here there is a cave problem about TD2.

We discuss the important point I want to convey.

1. Concept

The problem of a
concept. Here there is a fiction that has Concept type 2 higher degree than Baseline concept type 2. & Concept type 1 higher degree than Baseline Cm1.

The main reason transduality type 2 is goes beyond all duality systems' including the opposite concepts. So what if the level of a concept is different? But still in the same dimension.

A. Let's take a fictional Naruto parable if Naruto, Madoka, Anos get TransDuality type 2 for surpassing all duality systems in the verse:

1. Naruto.

Naruto is Already surpass all duality systems in his fiction but in the end it's just a type 2 concept. Different from Madoka

2. Madoka.

It is said that Madoka transcends all duality systems in her fiction including Concept type 1. Does this make Madoka's transduality type 2 superior to Naruto's transduality type 2. Because Naruto's type 2 transduality only exceeds Concept 2 type? Then what about Anos?

3. Anos It is said that Anos transcends all duality systems in his fiction including a higher degree than the basic concept of type 1. As we know. The layer sea is getting deeper and stronger. Including the concept (order) it will also get stronger. Then is anos type 2 transduality which exceeds a higher degree than type 1 Basic Concept any better than Madoka's transduality which only exceeds type 1 basic concept?

Summary:
1. Transduality type 2 which transcends Concept type 1> transduality type 2 which transcends only Concept type 2

2. Transduality type 2 that exceeds a higher degree of concept type 1> transduality type 2 than that which only goes beyond type 1 basic concept.

Notes:

1. The concept of type 1 refers to the description of cm 1. I call the concept of type 1 because it refers to the concept personally and looking for a concept.

2. For example, if someone asks? If so, it's not enough for TD2, etc. - let's say those above already have exactly the right qualifications for the description of TD2 as in VSB terminology. But the difference is only at the concept level.

3. If someone doesn't understand what I mean, you can comment. Feel free to correct

 

[Fixxed]

 

[1st_Virtue_of_Pure_Void]

following

 

[Udlmaster]

Transcendence of Conception isn’t Transdualism.

Transcendence itself is a duality. It’s not something that can be obtained through other means, you have to directly transcend duality (transcendence in this sense would be Reductionist Transcendence rather than normal Transcendence)

 

[Fixxed]

Transcendence of Conception isn’t Transdualism.

Transcendence itself is a duality. It’s not something that can be obtained through other means, you have to directly transcend duality (transcendence in this sense would be Reductionist Transcendence rather than normal Transcendence)

That's not my point

let's say those above already have exactly the right qualifications for the description of TD2 as in VSB terminology. But the difference is only at the concept leve

 

[Fixxed]

Can i bump this?

 

[Cat275]

I mean it is your thread right?

 

[Fixxed]

I mean it is your thread right?

Death thread/whatever is that

 

[Cat275]

Death thread/whatever is that

Necromancy*