Transcendence

[Ghost59]

Would transcending 1 A the same way 1A transcends High 1B. Would that be a high 1 A? Like the difference is immeasurable.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I'm pretty sure you need to transcend 1-A+ in order to be High 1-A

 

[Ghost59]

I'm pretty sure you need to transcend 1-A+ in order to be High 1-A

I see, So it wouldn't matter if the character X was unreachable, meaning adding layers wouldn't allow character Y to reach character X at all?

 

[Everything12]

Depending on the context, it could just be one level of Transcendence. As the difference between one Transcendence is equal to the difference between High 1-B and 1-A, and describing the character as Immeasurably or unreachably beyond a 1-A is also just one Transcendence.

 

[Rikimarox2]

So, incase I misunderstood, you mean that Character A is so far above Character B (assuming he is 1-A), that no matter how many times character B adds layers or transcends, he'll never reach Character A, right?

If that's the case, then that isn't just one transcendence. It could very well be H1A or 1-A+, or infinitely higher than baseline 1-A since no matter how many times Character B transcends, he can never reach Character A.

Although, I'm more leaned towards 1-A+/H1A tbh. Then again, I guess it still entirely depends on context.

 

[Everything12]

Without further context on these layers and proof that each one equals a Transcendence, which is normally proven through having several other 1-As Transcend each other with these layers. Then this is really only evidence for a single Transcendence, as even Baseline 1-A can contain scaling chain layers to it which aren't Transcendence.

 

[Rikimarox2]

I more so replied with the knowledge that these layers are equal to transcendence.

 

[Everything12]

Having Character A exceed Character B so much that no amount of layer can reach than can be done by simply one Transcendence. Wth the context was given so far this doesn't seem to be any more than a single Transcendence that an infinite scaling chain of Baseline 1-A Characters can't reach.

 

[Ghost59]

So, incase I misunderstood, you mean that Character A is so far above Character B (assuming he is 1-A), that no matter how many times character B adds layers or transcends, he'll never reach Character A, right?

If that's the case, then that isn't just one transcendence. It could very well be H1A or 1-A+, or infinitely higher than baseline 1-A since no matter how many times Character B transcends, he can never reach Character A.

Although, I'm more leaned towards 1-A+/H1A tbh. Then again, I guess it still entirely depends on context.

Yes. This is what I mean. Character A is so beyond Character B that no amount of 1A transcendences can reach A.

 

[Rikimarox2]

Ah, so each layer added is equal to 1 transcendence? If so, then Character A could very well be 1A+/ H1A.

 

[Ghost59]

Ah, so each layer added is equal to 1 transcendence? If so, then Character A could very well be 1A+/ H1A.

Yes.