• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tier 1-A Addendum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Either way, if anyone takes offense, I apologize for the whole side of the opposition for whatever was said.

Sorry.

None of us meant any ill will with this discussion, I'm sure I can speak for everyone on this regard.

Now can we leave this all behind in good faith if the discussion is settled?

If no one else has much else to add in regards to the topic, can we safely conclude this as is?
 
Nobody was taking anything at a personal level. It's just phrased in such a way where it comes off as more abrasive than polite, is all.
 
Once again, since the main discussion presented in the OP is settled, and no one seems to have anything else pertaining to the main subject to add, can we safely conclude this?
 
No one ever did really comment on the other part in the OP, pertaining to High 1-A/0 profiles.
 
If anyone was agreeing with that, I'm relatively sure they would have voiced an opinion in regards to it by now since we're well past 100 replies. In which case the ammount of people and staff against it surpasses the ammount of support by a large margin.
 
Ech. I could make a new thread about that, even if its a trivial matter, or a thread talking about adding a trivia section to the standard profile format.
 
So the majority agrees with keeping the redundancy in High 1-A/0 profiles.

Ooookay

Makes me think people didn't actually *read* the OP longer than 2 sentences.

But anyway, I'm out.
 
@Aeyu, I was going to add it to the OP, but I felt it drifted too far from my original purpose.
 
In good faith, as I pointed out, I'm not adressing that reply from Aeyu.

Very well, then. If there's nothing to be added, all that's left is to go over it one last time:

"Against: Antvasima, The Everlasting, FateAlbane, MatthewSchroeder, Promestein, ArbitraryNumbers, Monarch Laciel, DarkLK (was against it in the Message Flourine sent on his wall), EliminatorVenom, SSJRyu1, Celestial Pegasus, AssaltWaffle, Pachi2

Support: Saikou the Lewd King, Aeyu, Super Saiyan God Julian (kinda neutral however), Warren Valion, FanofRPGs, ProspectX

Neutral: TISSG7Redgrave, The J-ManRequiem

Not sure on UniteMyRice's position.


General opposition exceeded the support by a significant ammount. This includes many admins, more staff members and DarkLK as well who is usually the go to person in regards to Tiering System consults as well as Antvasima now as a bureaucrat. OP seems to have conceded and nothing else was added. Therefore, this can most likely be safely closed as far as I'm aware as the main point of the discussion seems settled.
 
I strongly agree with Matthew Schroeder, FateAlbane, The Everlasting, Promestein, Celestial Pegasus, SSJRyu1, DarkLK, etcetera.

This is a very bad idea that would cause unnecessary overcomplication of the wiki, and we do not have sufficient know-how to make proper distinction definitions or analysis of which characters that would fit in which tier.

Especially thank you to Matthew for attempting to keep this discussion under control.
 
I will close this thread and remove the highlight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top