- 6,850
- 1,499
Loki, Cap and Winter looks good to go to me. Ultron and Iron Man, I'm still iffy. Let's wait for the go signal from the others.Natse said:Iron Man, Ultron, Loki, Cap, and the Winter Soldier are a-ok right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Loki, Cap and Winter looks good to go to me. Ultron and Iron Man, I'm still iffy. Let's wait for the go signal from the others.Natse said:Iron Man, Ultron, Loki, Cap, and the Winter Soldier are a-ok right?
Still an argument can be made he was very close to the epicenter of the strike, like within inches. And he did technically destroy the city or did I gloss over something?Kkapoios said:Most of the energy that destroyed the city was channeled on the city and only a small portion of it should have hit Thor so no City level Durability for him.
I completely disagree. You can see him float, the guy got knocked out. He just fell like that. I don't disagree that he tanked the explosion but he was clearly koed with the explosion + the fall or else he would have flew out of there.Natse said:Thor somehow landed in the water with his arm outstretched, which almost never happens if you fall thousands of feet in an unconscious state. This means that he tanked it and recovered very quickly.
As for the Bifrost Bridge explosion, we'll see about that. For now, I'm guessing that explosion is Large Building to City-Block level powerful.
Could it possibly be diamond? Although I was told that diamond is brittle. Im not sure if there's truth to that as I've always thought diamond was the hardest substance known to man.Basilisk1995 said:Okay, crystal it is. Point is we need a calc or quantified feat to proceed.
The AP there is kinda meh. Durability-wise, how does it fare?Kkapoios said:Now that i'm watching a video with the feat ,the explosion was caused by the energy that was stored inside the bridge and not thor's hammer.Thor hit it at least 8 times and only fractured a small area.
Hulk was portrayed as the physical superior between the two, though I guess Thor was depowered during the Avengers 1 movie, I mean the entire movie. Still, Hulk has the better striking feats, like one-handing the flying armored snake thing in a standing position.Basilisk1995 said:What is your reason for thinking Hulk> Thor
He took a weakened Thor's hammer strikes but took it nonetheless. Regardless, I was talking about AP, not durability. I have no qualms about IM having Building Level durability.Basilisk1995 said:I definitely agree that Ironman is the weakest of the three but He did take quiet a few of Thor's hammer strikes and that is Building level.
IM said Thor alone could crack the landmass but its still devastating when it hits ground, thus the heatseal to rebound it and reroute it to the landmass and not dissipate into the outside.Heatforce said:IIRC the reason ironman had to cap the end the machine to ensure the landmass would be destroyed is because he thought thor would only create larger fragments. I still take that as Thor could potentially bust the city. Plus he was practically the epicenter of the explosion. Building level busting a city doesn't not compute.