• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Bare Minimum Magneto Revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
...I think you're getting it wrong, GPE is LS, KE is AP, we need KE counteraction feats
Nah I know about KE but I've seen us calc GPE and use that for AP
If people are putting unnecessary standards based on face value bias, they get unnecessary responses :/
True but its more the attitude just being kinda unneeded tbh

Aside from that, this RT might be helpful (The tearing satellites from orbit would be dope)
 
So you're inducing a timeframe but you're also saying your timeframe is nonsensical???

Also if its a relatively slow lift then it's LS, is it not :v
 
Nah I know about KE but I've seen us calc GPE and use that for AP
Isn't that for giants tho, and instances where something falls onto a person

Also I'll check the RT, seems his forcefields get good feats
 
Everybody please stop derailing and focus on finding useful feats to scale from instead. Thank you.
 
Okay. Sorry about that then.
 
Isn't that for giants tho, and instances where something falls onto a person
that's one of the possible uses, yes.
So you're inducing a timeframe but you're also saying your timeframe is nonsensical???
no, i am not inducing it because PE doesn't use a timeframe.
Also if its a relatively slow lift then it's LS, is it not :v
it's still LS even if it's a fast lift, and it can still be calced with PE if it's slow
 
that's one of the possible uses, yes.

no, i am not inducing it because PE doesn't use a timeframe.

it's still LS even if it's a fast lift, and it can still be calced with PE if it's slow
...ok this is genuinely sounding contradicting, i'll ask for a clarification offsite
 
If people are putting unnecessary standards based on face value bias, they get unnecessary responses :/
Being kind instead of being rude is not unnecessary :/ I just said my opinion. Agreed or not you should respect it. Didn't say that the wiki should follow it. I stop this right here because I don't want to derail the thread or get off topic.

Anyway, I remebered that Magneto in the recent Planet size X-Men has feats like this. Maybe they could help.
 
Magneto wasn't amped during this as Hope Summers, who was the one amping some of the others, did not help him. I don't know if these feats amount to anything substantial but magneto has also casually moved the S.W.O.R.D. space station twice. The first time is the original station the latter is an EXACT replica that was growing rapidly.
 
...just saying, both those feats don't look tier 7, let alone any higher.

Feel free to get them calced tho
 
So should we just use the 7-B calc :V
Maybe we could do something similar as what we currently use for Storm, with "5-A (fought these characters), at least 7-B environmental destruction (did this calculated feat)", as a placeholder solution until we get rid of scaling everybody to the Grey Hulk's outlier feat?
 
Post scans of him harming 5-As with instantaneous LS/AP then :V
 
Well, if I remember correctly he has repelled Thor's and She-Hulk's blows with his force field in the original late 1980s Avengers versus X-Men story that was a follow-up on the trial of Magneto story arc, but that is a durability feat.
 
There is also feat of him fighting the New Avengers from New Avengers Vol 4; the Collective. Although he wasn't in control of himself, but iirc he wasn't amped in any way either
 
Sentry of that time was most definitely 5A. Plus he gets scaled from binary carol too in that arc (the details are a bit fuzzy, so I cannot be 100% sure but when I get time, I can get you some scans of it)

It happens around New Avengers #19 - #20
 
I thought Sentry was a Dark Avenger, not a New Avenger. Weird.
 
He was a New Avenger, then Mighty Avenger, then Dark Avenger. Man's been going around.

Then he was also part of the Four Horsemen during his DSS days.
 
Confluctor is correct. I think that Sentry was finally killed off by Knull recently though.
 
Maybe we could do something similar as what we currently use for Storm, with "5-A (fought these characters), at least 7-B environmental destruction (did this calculated feat)", as a placeholder solution until we get rid of scaling everybody to the Grey Hulk's outlier feat?
I definitely think that scaling based off his own feats might be better
I can't recall Magneto hurting top tiers (I'm no expert tho) and as you've said the Grey Hulk feat is whack
 
Grey Hulk still stat amps, just less often, and Hulk canonically has been stated multiple times, to have able killed only ONE person throughout the years because Banner refuses to harm a fly, and like, the Thing "Tier 5" feats are whack NF calcs missing ALOT of context for face value feats.

Only reason the 4-B oofening didn't yeet the 5-A was because they were featless at that point, so the revision project would've never went through
 
I think that Hulk had a conversation with Amadeus Cho during World War Hulk in which he stated that he has killed several opponents over the years, with given examples from past storylines.
 
I think that Hulk had a conversation with Amadeus Cho during World War Hulk in which he stated that he has killed several opponents over the years, with given examples from past storylines.
True but he's mostly held back by Banner from going for kill on site
Grey Hulk still stat amps, just less often, and Hulk canonically has been stated multiple times, to have able killed only ONE person throughout the years because Banner refuses to harm a fly, and like, the Thing "Tier 5" feats are whack NF calcs missing ALOT of context for face value feats.

Only reason the 4-B oofening didn't yeet the 5-A was because they were featless at that point, so the revision project would've never went through
What feats do you suggest to replace it?
I recall some Tectonic stuff somewhere we could use
 
Yeah we should have this as it;'s own thread
7-B TK is fine and 5-A forcefields work
 
I think that Hulk had a conversation with Amadeus Cho during World War Hulk in which he stated that he has killed several opponents over the years, with given examples from past storylines.
He gives a single example, which Amadeus states isn't the norm in any way :V
 
Trying to get calcs for it rn.

This may be derailing for the thread at hand, I think 5-A forcefields and 7-B offensive is accepted? Until better feats are found that is
That seems fine, yes.
He gives a single example, which Amadeus states isn't the norm in any way :V
Okay. I thought that it was several, but may misremember.

He also later repeatedly killed a planetfull of demons in the Dark Dimension, but I suppose that those do not exactly count.
 
I have applied the revision, and am now closing the thread.

We're open to upgrading/downgrading his tier, granted calcs and legitimate scalings are provided, so feel free to make a thread regarding that topic in the future
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top