• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tet (No Game No Life) Upgrade?

Status
Not open for further replies.
My first CRT
I was wondering if it's possible to give Tet his tiers back again...

Galaxy level AP Scan:
Tet_Galaxy_Eplosion.png

Universe level AP Scan:
Screenshot_2020-12-12_182251.png

Hyperverse level AP Scans:
Tet_13-D.png

Precognition?
Suniaster_Power.png

Sandbox link here
 
Last edited:
First one sounds like a chain reaction, plus what does "evaporate the galaxy a few lught years away" means, does it mean it has galaxy level power but 4-A range?

Idk if "in trouble" means 3-A, but it does talk about a bomb.

Doesn't sound enough for 1-B, the dimensions gotta be infinitly greater than each other, might need more context, i man what dos they mean with combining the two?

Concept manip seems to be revised right now, but ATM type 1 is only for 1-A concept hax, seems fine for type 2, plus does tet already have time and causality manip?
 
First one sounds like a chain reaction, plus what does "evaporate the galaxy a few lught years away" means, does it mean it has galaxy level power but 4-A range?

Idk if "in trouble" means 3-A, but it does talk about a bomb.

Doesn't sound enough for 1-B, the dimensions gotta be infinitly greater than each other, might need more context.
The "evaporate the galaxy a few light years away" means that he is capable of completely evaporating entire galaxies that spans lightyears away from his initial world.

Transcending a 13-D being is not good enough to be 1-B?
 
Galaxies are millions of light years away, aside from being hundreds of thousands of light years long, so that's weird, unless there is some event i'm unaware of that's compacting the galaxies or something.

You gotta first prove those dimensions are eligible, we don't just give tier 1 for 5D or 10D anymore, thanks to a lot of revisions.

Now, the higher dimensions needs evidence of trascending each other to the point where the lower one is infinitly smaller and insignificant, such as a 7D being seeing the 6D As fiction or a dream or at least a flat piece of crap.

Comparing the higher dimensions to 2D and 3D might be enough, but i'm not sure.
 
You gotta first prove those dimensions are eligible, we don't just give tier 1 for 5D or 10D anymore, thanks to a lot of revisions.

Now, the higher dimensions needs evidence of trascending each other to the point where the lower one is infinitly smaller and insignificant, such as a 7D being seeing the 6D As fiction or a dream or at least a flat piece of crap.
Suniaster_Power.png

It said here that the Star Cup is compared to the existing power of the universe that was nothing but a mere fragment that spilled out and fell from the vessel.
Tet wields the Star Cup, so he should fit into this.
 
Being a fragment ain't enough, that just makes the star cup a higher level of universal, that doesn't make it transcend the universe existentially.
 
That's also not transcendence.

This was discussed before and already found to be invalid.
 
The galaxy feat is likely a translation error. It talks about the mechanics of how a supernovae work then talks about "evaporating" the galaxy for a few light-years. This doesn't really make much sense, both grammatically and when considering a galaxy is several thousand light years across.

Replace "evaporating" with "illuminating" and the quote becomes a standard description of supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursts that makes perfect sense. As such, the feat is most likely High 4-C to 4-B.

The "universe being in trouble" is too vague for any concrete tiering.
 
Do you have a scan on that, not all "true gods" are omnipresent, you really just need like 1 or 2 statements (context MIGHT affect it)
 
Was hoping for 1-B Tet, but I guess Low 2-C should do it for now. Also, are you ok with him being omnipresent (exists as one true god)?
Just mentioning dimensions isn't enough for 1-B anymore. The difference in dimensions being uncountably infinite must be proven.

Can't really say on the Omnipresence since I know little about the verse itself.
 
1.what are landscapes in this context.

2. why the likely type 1 in abstract existence?

3. Yeah, being a true god doesn't give omnipresence, being a god of something without context only tends to give you vontrol over it at best, not omnipresence.
 
The justifications say that he can control definitions, although that might be more akin to information manip.

The rest ain't concept manip without context.
 
Okay. Did you follow our standard instructions?

"Please remember to carefully read through and follow the instructions in our Common Editing Mistakes page, so no badly structured edits are made, and extensive cleanup work will not be necessary.

If you change the statistics for any characters, also remember to update the tier categories at the bottoms of the profile pages."

If so, is there anything left to do here, or should we close this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top