Subjective Reality Question

[YungManzi]

So the Subjective Reality page has this little tidbit

Existence Erasure/Nonexistent Physiology: By turning entities into dreams or illusions, the user is capable of granting Nonexistent Physiology or even completely erase them from reality. In that fashion, is capable to turn fantasy, imaginary and nonexistent beings real.

Now, does this mean we assume turning someone into a non-physical fantasy/dream/illusion = EE/NEP granting?

 

[YungManzi]

Bump

 

[YungManzi]

bump

 

[YungManzi]

Bump

 

[Alabastion]

yes

 

[YungManzi]

yes

Thanks for the response, anyone else have some input before I start calling some staff?

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

I'm confused but from what I know, I think yeah, it could also potentially override someone's NEP just imagine that he exist.

 

[YungManzi]

Bump

 

[YungManzi]

Bump

 

[DarkGrath]

Now, does this mean we assume turning someone into a non-physical fantasy/dream/illusion = EE/NEP granting?

It would depend on the context - particularly whether this non-physical "fantasy/dream/illusion" is treated as something explicitly "non-existent". I could imagine theoretical instances in which, for example, turning someone into a "dream" would just mean turning them into a non-physical (but still "real") form; in such a case, it wouldn't be EE/NEP (or probably even Subjective Reality in the first place for that matter).

It's difficult to give a single universal rule here that wouldn't inevitably cause problems in specific circumstances, but examples of feats like this should ideally be supported with evidence suggesting turning them into a "fantasy/dream/illusion" was explicitly making them "no longer real".

 

[YungManzi]

It would depend on the context - particularly whether this non-physical "fantasy/dream/illusion" is treated as something explicitly "non-existent". I could imagine theoretical instances in which, for example, turning someone into a "dream" would just mean turning them into a non-physical (but still "real") form; in such a case, it wouldn't be EE/NEP (or probably even Subjective Reality in the first place for that matter).

It's difficult to give a single universal rule here that wouldn't inevitably cause problems in specific circumstances, but examples of feats like this should ideally be supported with evidence suggesting turning them into a "fantasy/dream/illusion" was explicitly making them "no longer real".

Thanks for the response!