- 446
- 568
It seems it was her doing as she was standing behind the landscape and Ichibei was at the ReiokyuThat was just Ichibei
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems it was her doing as she was standing behind the landscape and Ichibei was at the ReiokyuThat was just Ichibei
Ah okIt's directly stated Ichibe did it
Where was it directly stated just askingIt's directly stated Ichibe did it
What's your evaluation of the thread in its totality?.The scan does not work by the way.
Most of the scans are working, it's only ones like this which aren't:It's working on my end. If all these scans don't work then....
I’d say it’d really make more sense to affiliate Senjumaru with the landscape especially because of her art of craftsmanshipIt's directly stated Ichibe did it
To be fair, the provided scan didn't work so to that user, it hasn't been proven yetBrother you’re theorizing while it’s stated Ichibe did it… idk why you’re trying to die on this hill
I'm trying my best bruhThis thread is aboutta hit 60 messages and none of the mods who've commented on this thread has evaluated it.
What y'all mfs doing bruh .
Ion even know what abilities this grants even If i assumed Senjumaru did it.From what I can tell, the real Soul King's Palace was hidden by Ichibe, but the illusion of the fake Soul King's Palace could have been created by Senjumaru.
It would be a type of Illusion Creation.Ion even know what abilities this grants even If i assumed Senjumaru did it.
It's not really an illusion like that
I disagree with this. No metafictional elements.
I don't see how Conceptual Manipulation would allow you to directly interact with the speech bubbles of a manga?I disagree with this. No metafictional elements.
Edit: How did I not see the ability while reading? Lol.
Edit: Again, ok maybe it could be argued, but I think this has been covered in his CM or?
Manipulating the text of the manga is def limited plot manip, as that falls under manipulating the writing to change what characters think/how they act/what they say/etc.I disagree with this. No metafictional elements.
Edit: How did I not see the ability while reading? Lol.
Edit: Again, ok maybe it could be argued, but I think this has been covered in his CM or?
It does affect reality though? like after Ichibe inked out Yhwach's sword no one could remember the name of said sword, not even Yhwach himself, samething with Ikomikdomoe, no one remembered his name after it was inked out of existence by Ichibe, not even Ikomikdomoe himself.it looks like text manipulation for me rather plot manipulation, as he is not manipulating the plot that governs reality
The ability is related to his conceptual manipulation, so it should be “Ability + CM1” rather separate. This is what I meant, and apologies for confusion.I don't see how Conceptual Manipulation would allow you to directly interact with the speech bubbles of a manga?
The problem is, there is no metafictional elements regarding this, so it is simply CM1 + text manipulation. Text manipulation also acts as this but without mentioning the conditions of plot manipulation.It does affect reality though? like after Ichibe inked out Yhwach's sword no one could remember the name of said sword, not even Yhwach himself, samething with Ikomikdomoe, no one remembered his name after it was inked out of existence by Ichibe.
I believe you mean CM2?, as that's what Ichibe's Conceptual Manipulation currently scales to.The problem is, there is no metafictional elements regarding this, so it is simply CM1 + text manipulation. Text manipulation also acts as this but without mentioning the conditions of plot manipulation.
I guess. Alright, sorry for my poor memory (I heard someone said CM 1 actually, but I could be wrong)I believe you mean CM2?, as that's what Ichibe's Conceptual Manipulation currently scales to.
Both would work, tho. As long as metafictional elements are at play or feats which imply such that, would work, otherwise this is text manipulation!Do you need an exact statement that metafictional elements are at play, or are feats which imply such okay as well?.
Alright.I guess. Alright, sorry for my poor memory (I heard someone said CM 1 actually, but I could be wrong)
Then i would say that manipulating a speech bubble, which is used to express the plot of one's story through vocalization would be considered as something metafictional, and manipulating it would require a certain level of Plot Manipulation to directly effect, change or even interact with.Both would work, tho. As long as metafictional elements are at play or feats which imply such that would work, otherwise this is text manipulation!
?The issue is that our instance fits perfectly under text manipulation type 1.
i'd say it would be text manip type 5 as it's linked to plot manip, but thats just meThe issue is that our instance fits perfectly under text manipulation type 1.
I'm not disagreeing with you that this could be Text Manipulation, i'm saying the specific type you brought up isn't applicable to what Ichibe did. Which type exactly would this fall under? because from what i'm reading the only "type" which Ichibe would fall under is the 5th type, which specifically talks about Reality Warping and Plot Manipulation.Burning in this context means erasing it. Ichibe erased a name from its existence using ink, this is text manipulation
I already explained the "metafictional" elements in this situation here.you need metafictional elements regardless of this, the interpretation of the context can't be used for plot manipulation