- 10,116
- 11,487
My only concern here is: Has this been properly accepted in a thread?
Or is this thread doubling to discuss it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My only concern here is: Has this been properly accepted in a thread?
I'm assuming they just thought that this was enough for it to be considered this way.My only concern here is: Has this been properly accepted in a thread?
Or is this thread doubling to discuss it?
Oven agreed with you so 2 staff agree its canonOh, okay okay.
Well, to me at the very least, it looks to be very straightforward in terms of canon, specially given the clarification of what the statement for "the next chapter of the story" meant (referring to this new game).
Last time it was smth like that but they tood me it should be potentially since Agony is only Tier 7 by scaling and has no feats that are even close to itAs for the profile, "potentially" should be changed to "likely".
I will wait a bit more and if @Comiphorous agrees with it I am gonna apply the changesRegarding the novels, I'm not sure.
We don't use potentially as terminology. The situation is closer to a likely rating.Last time it was smth like that but they tood me it should be potentially since Agony is only Tier 7 by scaling and has no feats that are even close to it
I'll bully you if you use potentially.Okay if someone bullies me for it I am pushing you under the bus LMAO
You can 100% say I gave you the go ahead. If anything happens, I still stand by my assessment.Okay if someone bullies me for it I am pushing you under the bus LMAO
Bit if a bump, but with the new ruins dlc having mimic in it, that means William was not retconned, and is actually Burntrap, meaning it should be on the profile.
I heard that the Mimic is able to shapeshift, so I'm not sure if the endos being different is enough to say that Burntrap isn't the Mimic
I don't think even the guys working on the game know what's canon and what's not, and they don't even know which SB ending is real. I'm extremely confused.I was more referring to the fact that the burntrap ending isn’t canon, so burntrap is still underground in the fnaf 6 location while the mimic is pulling shenanigans upstairs
I don't think even the guys working on the game know what's canon and what's not, and they don't even know which SB ending is real. I'm extremely confused.
Also, isn't the name Burntrap considered non-canonical by the Character Encyclopedia? I think I saw this somewhere.
I know, there's a youtuber I follow who said that. But seriously, it's because of these things that I can't keep up with fnaf stuff anymore, lots and lots of retcons and so on. Besides that thing about them changing history just because the fans "got the theories right".breaking Vanessa out of glitchtrap’s control and taking Freddy as a disembodied head is the canon ending.
Yeah, but in this context we can’t use it as a what if due to the fact that The Mimic and Burntrap are in two different places in ruins, so they can’t possibly be the same personI don't think it being non-canon means much, the Ennard stuff is also non-canon but we use it since it's basically a what if
Thanks for explaining what you disagree withDisagree FRA
I have no idea what is canon or not tbh. I am still trying to understand Ruin, what if Mimic is Glitchtrap and Burntrap? Anyways I will just watch the entire game first and try to understand shitYeah, but in this context we can’t use it as a what if due to the fact that The Mimic and Burntrap are in two different places in ruins, so they can’t possibly be the same person
I think that has to be the motto of the fnaf fandom.I have no idea what is canon or not tbh.