Space which able to contains higher-dimensional object.

[Lilixa]

Let say there are space which able to contains 5-D object completely. Would that means the space itself is actually 6-D ?

 

[Planck69]

No for the same reason that a room isn't 4-dimensional for holding a human. The space is just larger than the object to an unknown degree.

 

[DivineAura44]

I can destroy walls of a room, am I Low 2-C?

 

[FluffyCreatureZ]

I can destroy walls of a room, am I Low 2-C?

maybe.

 

[Lilixa]

No for the same reason that a room isn't 4-dimensional for holding a human. The space is just larger than the object to an unknown degree.

So space which able to contain 5-D does not necessary mean 6-D.

But 6-D space able to contain 5-D. Is that correct ?

 

[Deonment]

So space which able to contain 5-D does not necessary mean 6-D.

But 6-D space able to contain 5-D. Is that correct ?

yes

 

[Planck69]

So space which able to contain 5-D does not necessary mean 6-D.

But 6-D space able to contain 5-D. Is that correct ?

Yes.