• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Some clarifications about the differences between tier 2 characters via scaling

Messages
19,336
Reaction score
12,058
This character is ranked as "At least Low 2-C" via being much more stronger than a Low 2-C character .

This other one is ranked as "2-B" via being stronger than a 2-C and 2-C , likely 2-B characters .

And now a question, because here I have a doubt: If "Low 2-C x 2 =/= 2-C", then why you are 2-B if you are much more stronger than 2-Cs?

Why is the difference between 2-Cs and 2-Bs quantifiable and the difference between Low 2-Cs and 2-Cs isn't?
 
The reason to why the gap between Low 2-C and 2-C is unquantifiable is due to a 5 dimensional axis that exists between these two tiers. Whether or not a character can breach this is the difference between being Low 2-C and being 2-C. There's no way to measure that and that's why the gap is unquantifiable. That's why a character can be like 10000x baseline Low 2-C and still not be 2-C.

If said character breachs that barrier, its easy to quantify a 2-C with another 2-C, or even 2-B
 
Back
Top