- 167
- 50
Thoughts?
(And I wanted to make a blog post but can't for some reason)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not theirs. Also, it uses information contradicting to our sizes, so it'd be a waste of time. Better to explain why it's not allowed.Create a Blog but it will get declined right away anyway
I WOULD HAVE IF SOMEONE COULD HELP MECreate a Blog but it will get declined right away anyway
We know all of them, and we have debunked all of them. Please do not waste your time like this.Also there are more luffy scales that get him to uni but uh one will require a lot of time to read
then ask around.I WOULD HAVE IF SOMEONE COULD HELP ME
straight to uni? Is there any scales for possibly multiversal and tier 0?Also there are more luffy scales that get him to uni but uh one will require a lot of time to read
If it is even valid in the first place, why I doubt
Want some?Uni Luffy? Idk whatever crack yall be smoking but it's clearly a lot stronger than mine.
Does a bear shit in the woods?Want some?
I mean probablyDoes a bear shit in the woods?
It has more than one support.Uni Luffy is based on Blackbeard’s black hole with infinite rotational energy iirc.
Guys, it's goofy, but the math isn't wrong
Oh K.It has more than one support.
People do that yeahi can use it outside of the wiki?
I mean, if you want to ignore the objectively better method of getting the planet size, go ahead.i can use it outside of the wiki?
No one takes that statement as a scaling thing. Even though it's repeated several times in manga, databook and Ace novel. At this point it's embarrassing how we choose to ignore it.i think it might be for whitebeards tremors being stated to be capable of destroying the planet
You can't really calc something vague like that whenNo one takes that statement as a scaling thing. Even though it's repeated several times in manga, databook and Ace novel. At this point it's embarrassing how we choose to ignore it.
So until that statement gets repeated with more depth (because apparently you need more than 'destroy' for it) then it probably doesn't matter for the scaling.
Its a fruit that causes tsumanies and earthquakes, can't we use surface area to find the energy needed to wipe it?You can't really calc something vague like that when
You'd need to assume all of this which is pretty much equivalent to just fabricating the entire feat
- We don't know how long it would take
- We don't know in what way it would be destroyed; erased, cracked, fragmented, life wiped etc
- We don't know if he'd overcome the GBE or not
Hence the 'more depth'. We'll either need to be shown a feat of the quakes travelling globaly in a certain timeframe or a statement like 'destroy it one shot' type thing.You can't really calc something vague like that when
You'd need to assume all of this which is pretty much equivalent to just fabricating the entire feat
- We don't know how long it would take
- We don't know in what way it would be destroyed; erased, cracked, fragmented, life wiped etc
- We don't know if he'd overcome the GBE or not
Thoughts?
(And I wanted to make a blog post but can't for some reason)