- 20,817
- 9,056
Continuing off this thread, which upgraded the 6 Kings to 4-A (1.688e63 Joules), I realized that evidence exists to put Peak Counts, and Duke Ranks at 4-B.
Iris when she fought Isis, who is a 6 King, was Upper Count Rank
So Iris was inferior to Peak Counts, with the difference between Iris and Isis being a billion to a trillion times
A billion times less than 1.688e63 Joules would be 1.688e54 Joules, and a trillion times less would be 1.688e51 Joules, unless I did the math wrong, albeit these numbers aren't completely accurate since the 6 Kings essentially scale to creating a pocket dimension with a starry sky, since they destroy worlds with starry skies, but in addition they also destroy 2 planet sized realms bigger than Earth.
Anyway, In the previous thread we also established that Mid Count Ranks are 5-A (2.8373406e+34 Joules), in this thread we are establishing that Upper Count Ranks scale to 4-B, this gap between ranks is supported by statements from the story such as when its stated that the difference between the top and bottom of Count Rank is particularly large, especially in regards to Peak Count Ranks who despite being the same Count Rank as the others, it's as if they are at a different dimension than them (Chapter 1277).
Peak Count Ranks being at a different dimension compared to those below them would put them further into 4-B, don't think it pushes them to 4-A, but they should get an At least 4-B rating, and Duke Ranks would scale above them. We could also maybe argue that if Upper Count Ranks which are inferior to Peak Ranks are 4-B, then Polaris feat of creating pocket dimension with starry skies, which currently is treated as being ambiguous, because it could be interpreted as either stars or meteors, thus is only a possibly rating, has more reasons to be legit, thus Peak Counts and above should be likely 4-A,, though I could see this being sort of circular in reasoning since the only accepted 4-A is by the 6 Kings destroying a world with planets and stars, which would be a similar kind of feat as what Polaris supposedly created, however the 6 Kings feats were done very causally such as just by moving, and not to mention they destroy/create a bigger world, so I don't think there is much of a problem with the scaling.
Mid Count Rank (5-A - Already accepted due to creating worlds with Moons)
Upper Count Rank (4-B - For being a billion to a trillion times weaker than the 6 Kings who scale to destroying worlds as big as multiple planets with stars)
Peak Count Rank (At least 4-B, likely 4-A - For being in a different dimension compared to the ranks below them, and creating what could be interpreted as starry skies)
Duke Rank (At least 4-B, likely 4-A - Being superior to the others)
Iris when she fought Isis, who is a 6 King, was Upper Count Rank
So Iris was inferior to Peak Counts, with the difference between Iris and Isis being a billion to a trillion times
A billion times less than 1.688e63 Joules would be 1.688e54 Joules, and a trillion times less would be 1.688e51 Joules, unless I did the math wrong, albeit these numbers aren't completely accurate since the 6 Kings essentially scale to creating a pocket dimension with a starry sky, since they destroy worlds with starry skies, but in addition they also destroy 2 planet sized realms bigger than Earth.
Anyway, In the previous thread we also established that Mid Count Ranks are 5-A (2.8373406e+34 Joules), in this thread we are establishing that Upper Count Ranks scale to 4-B, this gap between ranks is supported by statements from the story such as when its stated that the difference between the top and bottom of Count Rank is particularly large, especially in regards to Peak Count Ranks who despite being the same Count Rank as the others, it's as if they are at a different dimension than them (Chapter 1277).
Peak Count Ranks being at a different dimension compared to those below them would put them further into 4-B, don't think it pushes them to 4-A, but they should get an At least 4-B rating, and Duke Ranks would scale above them. We could also maybe argue that if Upper Count Ranks which are inferior to Peak Ranks are 4-B, then Polaris feat of creating pocket dimension with starry skies, which currently is treated as being ambiguous, because it could be interpreted as either stars or meteors, thus is only a possibly rating, has more reasons to be legit, thus Peak Counts and above should be likely 4-A,, though I could see this being sort of circular in reasoning since the only accepted 4-A is by the 6 Kings destroying a world with planets and stars, which would be a similar kind of feat as what Polaris supposedly created, however the 6 Kings feats were done very causally such as just by moving, and not to mention they destroy/create a bigger world, so I don't think there is much of a problem with the scaling.
TLDR
Mid Count Rank (5-A - Already accepted due to creating worlds with Moons)
Upper Count Rank (4-B - For being a billion to a trillion times weaker than the 6 Kings who scale to destroying worlds as big as multiple planets with stars)
Peak Count Rank (At least 4-B, likely 4-A - For being in a different dimension compared to the ranks below them, and creating what could be interpreted as starry skies)
Duke Rank (At least 4-B, likely 4-A - Being superior to the others)
Last edited:
