- 754
- 2,226
This is a really small and simple thread.
I noticed this while getting the links for another thread. On our Set Theory explanation page:
It is likely that this was left unnoticed as everyone was busy checking far more important things, but the page mentions that it is an explanation for Low 1-A and above, but as far as our current Tiering System goes, Mathematics only plays a role in Low 1-A and below.
I'm not sure if there's even a thread needed for this, but just to be safe, I made one. That's all, really. Just change "and above" to "and below". Or reword it to:
VotesAgree:
Neutral:
I noticed this while getting the links for another thread. On our Set Theory explanation page:
The following is an explanation of the upper bounds of this wiki's Tiering System, namely the parts encompassed by Low 1-A and above, although the concepts presented here do have great influence on the functionings of much lower tiers. For information on the primary measuring stick used to categorize those, please see this page instead.
It is likely that this was left unnoticed as everyone was busy checking far more important things, but the page mentions that it is an explanation for Low 1-A and above, but as far as our current Tiering System goes, Mathematics only plays a role in Low 1-A and below.
I'm not sure if there's even a thread needed for this, but just to be safe, I made one. That's all, really. Just change "and above" to "and below". Or reword it to:
The following is an explanation of the upper bounds of this wiki's Tiering System, namely the parts encompassed by High 1-B+ and Low 1-A, although the concepts presented here do have great influence on the functionings of much lower tiers. For information on the primary measuring stick used to categorize those, please see this page instead.
Votes
DarkDragonMedeus ,ActuallySpaceMan42 ,Vietthai96 ,Antvasima
Disagree:Neutral:
Last edited: