SMALL ADDITION TO THE LOW 2-C

[KingPin0422]

KingPin's wording mostly seems fine to me, but as far as I am aware, the plural form of continuum can be either continuums or continua, and the former is easier for our visitors to understand.

I mean, it's an extremely small change so I'll take either or. As long as the gist of the proposal is understood, I don't think we'll have any problems.

 

[Arc7Kuroi]

?

KingCrim is a long time friend of mine and I was calling him a mrk for derailing the thread

 

[AKM sama]

It looks like a harmless change that better explains what the space-time continuum means, so it's probably fine with me. But for the purposes of ratings, "destruction of space-time continuum" == "destruction of past, present and future of the universe". So we shouldn't need the latter statement if the former is already present, until and unless there is context in the verse that distinguishes the two.

 

[PrinceofPein]

It looks like a harmless change that better explains what the space-time continuum means, so it's probably fine with me. But for the purposes of ratings, "destruction of space-time continuum" == "destruction of past, present and future of the universe". So we shouldn't need the latter statement if the former is already present, until and unless there is context in the verse that distinguishes the two.

Yes this is fine, who will apply it?

 

[KLOL506]

It looks like a harmless change that better explains what the space-time continuum means, so it's probably fine with me. But for the purposes of ratings, "destruction of space-time continuum" == "destruction of past, present and future of the universe". So we shouldn't need the latter statement if the former is already present, until and unless there is context in the verse that distinguishes the two.

Oh yes, absolutely.

 

[Antvasima]

So can somebody write a draft text that we should add to the relevant page based on the previous version and what AKM said?

 

[AKM sama]

KingPin's draft looks fine to me.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That should be fine to apply then, except for that we should preferably use the word "continuums" instead of "continua".

 

[PrinceofPein]

Well if someone is willing to add it, I am on mobile and will be on mobile for a while so if someone is willing to help

 

[Antvasima]

KingPin's draft looks fine to me.

Okay. That should be fine to apply then, except for that we should preferably use the word "continuums" instead of "continua".

Well if someone is willing to add it, I am on mobile and will be on mobile for a while so if someone is willing to help

@KingPin0422

Would yoube willing to handle it if I unlock the page?

 

[KingPin0422]

No offense, but... can't you do it yourself? It's just copying and pasting some text, I think.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will handle it then.

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so:

Tiering System

The following is a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical system the VS Battles Wiki utilizes to properly categorize and index fictional characters, entities, and objects based on the scale of their feats and the varying scopes that they can affect or create/destroy. Though Destructive...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Is there anything else left to do here?

 

[PrinceofPein]

No this can be closed, thanks to everyone for your help

 

[KLOL506]

Has this thread been linked in the summary when edited?

 

[KLOL506]

EDIT: It has been linked. Yeah, this thread can be concluded and closed now.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.