• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Slenderverse ARGS GDT

TheShape03 said:
Breaking a windshield and tearing apart people don't have 9-B calculations, should we downgrade The Rake to "At least 9-C"? And his speed should be downgraded to unknown, since he has no sources.
Click to expand...
9-C should be good enough, the windshield feat is not visible at all plus I have one source that suggests he's superhuman
 
Vyfourthaccount said:
You gotta make a CRT first if I'm not wrong
Click to expand...
Well, FC/OC doesn't even have sections for CRTs, and admins are rarely active. People who create CRTs (In the general discussion section) just do so to ask for a second opinion, and the only thing that is said about review discussions on the FC/OC page is this:
The FC/OC VS Battles Wiki is a community primarily centered around individual projects, so it goes without saying that you should not edit another user's original content without their permission. Minor edits, such as typo or formatting corrections, are acceptable, but changes to anything significant are not.
  • There is an exception to this, however, and that is in the realm of fanfiction not made by the page's creator. Anyone can edit these pages, so long as their edits are within reason. Revisions for these pages should be handled through community discussions and proper revision threads, however.
Click to expand...
However, I can make a CRT if you want.

In my opinion, considering the large number of famous fan characters out there, a content revision protocol similar to the one on the main wiki should be implemented. Only more flexible because this wiki is more empty.
 
TheShape03 said:
Well, FC/OC doesn't even have sections for CRTs, and admins are rarely active. People who create CRTs (In the general discussion section) just do so to ask for a second opinion, and the only thing that is said about review discussions on the FC/OC page is this:

However, I can make a CRT if you want.

In my opinion, considering the large number of famous fan characters out there, a content revision protocol similar to the one on the main wiki should be implemented. Only more flexible because this wiki is more empty.
Click to expand...
Eh fair enough, I guess there's no need for a CRT then
 
TheShape03 said:
Breaking a windshield and tearing apart people don't have 9-B calculations, should we downgrade The Rake to "At least 9-C"? And his speed should be downgraded to unknown, since he has no sources.
Click to expand...
If I remember correctly, I think there’s a statement that rake can break metal chains (5:44) which I think is enough to grant 9-B. Plus breaking a windshield is 9-B
 
Scourge_8 said:
If I remember correctly, I think there’s a statement that rake can break metal chains
Click to expand...
I don't know, have you seen how small the links in those chains are? I don't think something like that would make it to 9-B. Most of the calculations I've seen put similar feats in 9-C (I know this last one I put is 9-B, but it talks about multiple links, use only one link and the result will be 9-C; 11.64 * 597 = 6949.08 J). Not to mention that the way he could break the chain is not seen, and it is mentioned that the chain could stop him for a moment, so it would take more than one hit to break the chains.
Scourge_8 said:
Plus breaking a windshield is 9-B
Click to expand...
I have some problems with that calculation.

  • It wasn't accepted and the person who evaluated it seems to have some issues with it.
  • There is a better calculation that puts the result of that at 9-C (4973.301956602 Joules, I only take into account the plastic layer and do not take into account the glass, due to the following point)
  • The fragmentation of glass is not currently accepted, due to its fragility and the fact that it apparently does not absorb energy as other materials do. There is another way to calculate glass shattering, though it requires a new calculation.

Also, both calculations don't work for this feat anyway, since it happens off-screen and The Rake isn't shown to have completely destroyed the windshield.
 
TheShape03 said:
I don't know, have you seen how small the links in those chains are? I don't think something like that would make it to 9-B. Most of the calculations I've seen put similar feats in 9-C (I know this last one I put is 9-B, but it talks about multiple links, use only one link and the result will be 9-C; 11.64 * 597 = 6949.08 J). Not to mention that the way he could break the chain is not seen, and it is mentioned that the chain could stop him for a moment, so it would take more than one hit to break the chains.

I have some problems with that calculation.

  • It wasn't accepted and the person who evaluated it seems to have some issues with it.
  • There is a better calculation that puts the result of that at 9-C (4973.301956602 Joules, I only take into account the plastic layer and do not take into account the glass, due to the following point)
  • The fragmentation of glass is not currently accepted, due to its fragility and the fact that it apparently does not absorb energy as other materials do. There is another way to calculate glass shattering, though it requires a new calculation.

Also, both calculations don't work for this feat anyway, since it happens off-screen and The Rake isn't shown to have completely destroyed the windshield.
Click to expand...
Aight fair enough then, should we also downgrade InHABITED Evan if he ever gets a profile? since he scales to the rake and that his best feat is prolly just snapping necks and busting open doors
 
I think 9-C+ makes sense for both these characters since breaking windshields and snapping necks are 9-C+ I think it would be pretty consistent
 
Scourge_8 said:
Aight fair enough then, should we also downgrade InHABITED Evan if he ever gets a profile? since he scales to the rake and that his best feat is prolly just snapping necks and busting open doors
Click to expand...
Yeah, in case we redo HABIT's profile, his hosts' key would become "At least 9-C".
Scourge_8 said:
I think 9-C+ makes sense for both these characters since breaking windshields and snapping necks are 9-C+ I think it would be pretty consistent
Click to expand...
The windshield breaking calculation was no longer accepted after glass fragmentation was no longer used. So it's invalid. Not to mention that The Rake is not shown to have destroyed the entire windshield.

Snapping necks isn't 9-C+, it's 10-A. The 9-C+ calculation in that blog is poorly done, something recognized by staff members. It seems that whoever did it made a mistake when converting mm^3 to cm^3.
 
I did a HABIT sandbox, there’s still stuff to be done especially with the gif that is actin weird for some reason. Regarding Slendeman’s profile, I think I’m done and if you guys are fine with it, I’ll upload it
 
Scourge_8 said:
I did a HABIT sandbox, there’s still stuff to be done especially with the gif that is actin weird for some reason. Regarding Slendeman’s profile, I think I’m done and if you guys are fine with it, I’ll upload it
Click to expand...
Just make the powers and abilities part in a list and It'll be good
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MrCricket8464
Does KJ belong on FC/OC Battles or Joke Battles?
Replies
6
Views
436
MrCricket8464
MrCricket8464
ThePrimalHunter
FC/OC vs Joke Battles Wiki Matches
Replies
1
Views
2K
H3110l12345I20
H3110l12345I20
Sans2345
Should we really allow Backrooms ARGs? (Like Kane Pixels for example)
Replies
7
Views
2K
Iiliminal
Iiliminal
Sans2345
Is "_Boisvert" valid for FC/OC or VS Battles Wiki?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Phoenks
Phoenks
PuffletronGaming
About Social Influencing
Replies
2
Views
1K
Colonel_Krukov
Colonel_Krukov
Back
Top