• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Should we add a "Peak Human" Category?

Like the title says, considering Peak Human is also used as a ability and "Power", could it be possible to add a category which includes characters that are Peak Humans and/or have Peak Human Characteristics?
 
Peak Humans are considered 9-C.

9-C: Street level Characters who stand at the threshold of human strength and capabilities, represented by olympic level athletes or rigorously trained martial artists, as well as larger animals.

Tiering System

So we would put them in the Tier 9 category.
 
Kuroiha said:
Peak Humans are considered 9-C.
So we would put them in the Tier 9 category.

True, but at the same time also includes 9-B and 9-B characters which are above peak humans.
 
Also true.

This is... a rather untouched subject, at least within my short 2 years on here. It would make sense, seeing as we do list it as an ability.

Main issue would be going back to edit Peak Human characters, and also adding an extra category to organization, when we already have hundreds.

There was once a debate back in 2019 on whether or not we should add categories for individual tiers, and the general consensus was a firm "NO" by the majority of folks.

It may be good to consult staff on this.
 
Back
Top