- 1,263
- 394
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does SCP 682 immortality works? Who grants it?I don't think gil can get around 682's immortality and 682 can't do anything to gil. Inconclusive.
SCP-343 does, and I dont think Gil can get past Mid-Godly regen, and even then 682 adaptsHow does SCP 682 immortality works? Who grants it?
Gilgamesh can affect it then, because Gilgamesh is like, 6-D in this key, and his conceptual hax has a lot of layers above baseline, which is enough to neg Mid-GodlySCP-343 does, and I dont think Gil can get past Mid-Godly regen, and even then 682 adapts
Gil can't concept nuke someone unless im missing somethingGilgamesh can affect it then, because Gilgamesh is like, 6-D in this key, and his conceptual hax has a lot of layers above baseline, which is enough to neg Mid-Godly
Conceptual Manipulation (He has various conceptual armaments within his arsenalGil can't concept nuke someone unless im missing something
Thats fancy durability negation, I dont think there's a Noble Phantasm that concept nukes anyoneConceptual Manipulation (He has various conceptual armaments within his arsenal
But it is currently accepted as Conceptual ManipulationThats fancy durability negation, I dont think there's a Noble Phantasm that concept nukes anyone
He is 6-D i believe, being below someone doesn't mean an entire transcendence between themisn't 682 5-D considering that he's implied to be below Uriel?
Did you not read "Fancy durability negation"? It negates durability conceptually.But it is currently accepted as Conceptual Manipulation
but I made a thread with Uriel Vs. Gilgamesh and they said Gil stomps because Uriel is 5-D. if he's stronger than 682, then that doesn't look good. or were they wrong?He is 6-D i believe, being below someone doesn't mean an entire transcendence between them
Having concptual manip doesnt automatically equate to having conceptual erasureBut it is currently accepted as Conceptual Manipulation
can't Gilgamesh return 682 to nothingness with Enuma Elish?Having concptual manip doesnt automatically equate to having conceptual erasure
Scp will adapt to itcan't Gilgamesh return 682 to nothingness with Enuma Elish?
682 will adapt to it.can't Gilgamesh return 682 to nothingness with Enuma Elish?
Enuma elish also only negs durability, and gets adapted tocan't Gilgamesh return 682 to nothingness with Enuma Elish?
from what I see on his profile, he only resist plot manip and doesn't have it himself.Also don't anything about gil but can't 682 use plot manip to win
He isn't haxed, he is just REALLY ******* hard to killIncon. had no idea 682 was that haxed. very impressive.
oh **** I just saw his incon matches. it's a wall of text. incon god wasn't an exaggeration.He isn't haxed, he is just REALLY ******* hard to kill
682 reminds me of a honeybadger and superboy primeHe isn't haxed, he is just REALLY ******* hard to kill
maybe BB has a better shot since she's more haxed offensively.682 reminds me of a honeybadger and superboy prime
BB throws conceptual erasure, since she actually does have that.maybe BB has a better shot since she's more haxed offensively.
she also has absorption, which could help if her layers go beyond his resistance to it.BB throws conceptual erasure, since she actually does have that.
Her layers laugh the shit out of 682's resistances.she also has absorption, which could help if her layers go beyond his resistance to it.