- 22,682
- 23,235
It's only ever expressed as singular
It even has a book written to oppose it and there isn't an implication that any reality has more than one Darkhold.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Scarlet witch upgrade
- Thread starter Yoazkk6188
- Start date
- Status
- 7,780
- 11,569
To be fair, I think it's ultimately just confusing the way characters in the MCU call different things a "universe" and a "reality" in different contexts.
The most typical use of universe is a single branch of a timeline, since that would account for the entirety of perceived existence for a vast majority of characters.
Either way, I feel as if the implication of any normal object in an infinitely branching timeline is that there are infinite copies of it. So I'd say we'd need an implication/statement that there isn't more than one, rather than one that there is (because that should be our logical default.)
That is to say, I think they're just referring to a single branch as a universe there, even though 'universe' can also refer to a Low 1-C structure in the MCU.
Though given there's ambiguity there, how would you feel about a "Possibly Low 2-C"?
- 22,682
- 23,235
I guess you and Phoneks raised enough points for me to understand where that's coming from, even if I dont entirely agree with it.
- 7,780
- 11,569
Alright. I am willing to accept that as a compromise then.
- 1,526
- 335
I'm not saying it's applicable on vs battle wiki or not, but I'm just putting it as a little bit of support for upgrading her. I've seen the official do this a lot but they have anti feats so they can't use that statement but with Scarlet Witch, it's more of a support for her upgrades because at least she has feats that support her statement
- 1,526
- 335
Her current High 3-A is actually listed as up to, so why did we have to change it to possibly?
- 13,273
- 13,891
It would be
Up to High 3-A, possibly Low 2-C
As of now Qawsed and Fine point are both in agreement with that.
DDM has yet to update on their stance.
- 1,526
- 335
If she's already High 3-A and adds possibly Low2-C, where do we go to support that? If destroyed every darkhold is High 3-A
- 13,273
- 13,891
The point of the possibly is that Qawsed agrees with me and Fine point that based on the cosmology, it has enough support to say she did destroy an uncountably infinite amount of them.
But Qawsed himself still seems to not fully support it. So it's a compromise.
- 1,526
- 335
That's quite strange
- 11
- 4
Alright thanks
- 7,780
- 11,569
Since the contention is over the interpretation of the same evidence for both positions, you can keep the justification exactly the same and just have the rating which precedes it be "High 3-A, Possibly Low 2-C."
You could also add something along the lines of "Possibly including copies across the entire multiverse and every branch of each timeline."
- 34,634
- 41,954
Possibly Low 2-C for reasons above is fine by me.
- 1,526
- 335
You can add it if you want to, I will say that I am not very good at editing character profiles, I am afraid that I will make it worse
- 7,780
- 11,569
It seems fine, so I will close this.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
