• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Saitama vs Iron Man

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThePerpetual

VS Battles
Retired
2,861
224
This one seemed fun, so here we are.

Win by KO/death/incapacitation/etc. Battle in-character, starts 100 meters apart above some random uninhabited city somewhere, all standard powers and such available. Who wins? Stating your reasoning would be appreciated.

Saitama
Invincible Iron Man 1 Promo.0
 
Benbenben101010 said:
Iron man stomps via Thor buster
starts 100 meters apart above some random uninhabited city somewhere, all standard powers and such available.


Anyway, Saitama casually due to ridiculously large reflex gap.
 
Ray fly said:
if you watch the anime or readthe manga you will see nothing worcks on him (my spelling sucks by the way) thers a guy in the anime with phycic powers he hit saitama with the force eqevalent of a black hole and saitama just stood there like it was nothing then saitama therw a small rock at the guy head to split it in half (with no effort at all)
NLF, first off. Black holes not only don't act like real black holes in fiction, but that was a clear hyperbole, as a lot more wouldve been destroyed with the force of a black hole.
 
That is what we here call pis, or a hyperbole. Either way it's not true.


And for the fight, I can't decide, love both characters. Iron Man is my second favorite Marvel Character, and Saitama I recently got into OPM. But I guess I'd go with Tony for actual skill and he is so much smarter than Saitama it hurts.
 
Wow...the wankage is real here. Even if it was just the force of a black hole, it should have done the same damage as a black hole, and sucked everyting in. Sooo...
 
Ray fly said:
I dident say it was a black hole I said the forc of the attack was eqivalent to the forc of a black hole saitama dose some absurd things becues of his everything trust me saitama can ge hit by gokus attacks and still be like dont feel a damen thing
Wanking and using NLF for Saitama is against wiki rules.

If he got hit by gravitational force as high as black hole, everything in vicinity would be destroyed. The spaceship was intact and nothing happened
 
Im not a wanker watch the anime and read the manga you will see exsactly what im talking about or go on youtube and serch saiatamas power you will see what I mean peopal talk about him alot and about his power Im telling saitama is not to be tackin likely
 
I saw the anime and saw stuff about the manga, both the redrawn and original Rayfly, and no, Saitama cannot be anywhere close to where you say. There are no feats to prove it. The logic helps to disprove it, if it was really the force of a black hole, like Faisal said before, everything would have been sucked in. But none of that ever happened. Saitama's best feat so far is stopping a possible planet busting attack, which was at least multi-continent. Still strong, but Iron Man who is Small Planet+ Level still have an intelligence ranking so much higher than Saitama's that should make it alone a stomp thread.
 
The fact that you recommended YouTube to find out Saitama's powers makes me think that you are probably one of those people who claim Saitama is limitless and has a punch with the force of a Big Bang.
 
I have seen that clip before, and it doesn't show why Saitama should win. Heck, Teen Goku could do better than what's in that scene.
 
More Saitama wanking. Oh god please no. Hey, I like OPM and all, but seriously, Saitama wanking gets on my nerves. If Saitama had any other feats, I would vouch for him, mind you.
 
Just out of curiosity, it's been said that Tony blitzes by many users, yet looking at his profile the Relativistic speed is specifically for flight. If most every distinction between travel/flight speed and combat speed woud invoke the travel speed fallacy, why do the profiles bother to list the difference? Never really made sense to me.
 
You know, the same combat speed issues that apply to Thor and Silver Surfer apply to Iron Man.
 
The Invincible Iron Man said:
He could hold his own against Doom's magic (for a decent period of time) which is definitely a feat for the current armor. Saitama has no chance.
Also out of curiosity, is this a highly consistent thing Doom does?
 
Thor and Silver Surfer = supersonic in combat.
 
Well, Doom's feats with magic in his regular armor (which he is in, or in a disguise in the Invincible Iron Man comics) he is able to destroy many cities/mass mind control. But now I realize that isn't enough, at least from my experience.
 
This thread is pretty much concluded. May this be added? I'm pretty sure this is more than seven and it's unanimous, aside from the one...incident.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top