• The VS Battles wiki celebrates its 10 year anniversary!

    Please click here for further information.
388
49
You'll have to contact Calc Group Members.
But I think Saitama and Boros actually scale higher, because of surface wiping statement.
 
You'll have to contact Calc Group Members.
But I think Saitama and Boros actually scale higher, because of surface wiping statement.
That's why I made this thread in the first place, if you have a name of a calc group member then tell me so I can contact him immediately
 

NotSoPrimal

Formerly 'Prime'
70
3
He divided by 2 when he should of multiplied and those clouds I believe look like Nacreous and noctilucent clouds? Not sure, can anyone help me on this?
 
744
138
the post CSRC atmosphere split is a calc that has been redone many many times, but there has never been much progress towards choosing the most suitable calc/end. that's why Saitama still scales to only 183 petatons from CSRC.
 

NotSoPrimal

Formerly 'Prime'
70
3
the post CSRC atmosphere split is a calc that has been redone many many times, but there has never been much progress towards choosing the most suitable calc/end. that's why Saitama still scales to only 183 petatons from CSRC.
Was it because of the material?
Like one called it a planet buster, another called it a star destroyer and the last one said it would just wipe the Earth's surface.
 
the post CSRC atmosphere split is a calc that has been redone many many times, but there has never been much progress towards choosing the most suitable calc/end. that's why Saitama still scales to only 183 petatons from CSRC.
Well it's still okay to revaluate this calc so I'm gonna post it in the official calc thread
 

DMUA

VS Battles
Calculation Group
22,220
4,296
That calc is ancient and I feel like there have been many long since forgotten threads on it's validity

I don't remember any specific examples but
 

DMUA

VS Battles
Calculation Group
22,220
4,296
I would like you to rephrase because I don't even know what that's supposed to mean
 

DMUA

VS Battles
Calculation Group
22,220
4,296
Because your grammar is quite close to incomprehensible and I don't even know what context it being mentioned is in

Like, I know the calc stopped being used at some point, i'm sure there was a good reason, there have been plenty of recalculations, I don't know why this particular 2015 thing is relevant
 

DMUA

VS Battles
Calculation Group
22,220
4,296
I personally find that to be bizarre considering this is a result of Saitama punching it, not really him actually firing it, but

Look, I don't know anything about what's the history behind this, I think it's fine but, I really haven't been following.
 

DMUA

VS Battles
Calculation Group
22,220
4,296


I know you're being serious but, I just had to get that out of my system

Anyways, no. He didn't actually shut down Boros' powers, he just punched his beam so hard that he caused the impact to go an entirely different direction. It's not an ability, just pure AP.
 

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Discussion Moderator
61,020
6,637
Get the calc properly done and evaluated, or remove it

Given we have zero idea where it lies, remove it
 
Top