Officiel debunk
Note: I will try to debunk those claims made up against me as NICELY as possible.
"If you state an opinion that's not his, it's headcanon."
If someone cannot provide evidence for their claim then that is headcanon. Nothing rule-breaking, just dishonest statements.
"He invades every vs battle thread that involves DBS and says "blitzes and one-shots" even if speed's equalized."
Well, most of the time when I say that it's because they can (a character I say blitzes or ones-shots) transform and can become superior statistically against their opponent and did say that said character blitzes and one-shots when speed wasn't equalized. Again nothing rule-breaking.
"He also invades every vs battle thread with the 1-A Goku from above and talks about how his ranking on the wiki is incorrect."
. Wrong, I do not invade all vs thread, that is a false claim. That once again, pretty much failed to disprove me, and I only mention it in some threads by saying, using the wiki scaling he loses, but with the proper one or higher scaling, he (character) will one-shots the second one.
"He assumes hax are AP based and thinks because that's how it is in DBS, it's like that all over, and won't take any counter."
In DB , hax's are ap base, hakai is ap based, and you never counter me and I just said that in DB ,or can tank hax with ap , they can negate hax by having superior raw power than your opponent which is a valid argument and I didn't say all hax, which would be a high ball. Once more, those claims are from people who have a problem with me and I did nothing wrong for this type of claim. And I even provided evidence for that when asked for it.
"Will never make a CRT about his claims."
I already explained why in other threads (when people asked why I didn't do crt) why they would not be accepted, but you decided to ignore those statements. They were also rules for not making the crt for the kind of stuff that I'm trying to update.
"Repeatedly argues against the wiki's standards."
Which one, The only argument I made is that this character should be higher than the stats they are given and I often say , that with the stats they are given in the op or wiki , he will win or lose.
Bumps threads older than Marvel.
The first time I was in this wiki, I didn't know what was a necro, and they were not as old as someone people claimed to be (older than marvel), if referring to that sonic post, that person should have never posted old debates in new threads, that is misleading obviously.
"Yeah, he's known for causing a bit of an issue, and just constant annoying posts trying to upgrade dragon ball to 1-A. The reason he tried to upgrade them to 1-A was because there is a single statement that says "outerdimensional""
The only post I tried to bring up 1-A dbs is in one thread, and most people there failed to disprove anything and I decided to drop it. Evidence is evidence , even a single one is more than enough (had more than that but, let us ignore that for a moment). This shows that it has nothing to do with rules only because they are annoyed or couldn't argue against me literally.
"Other than that, he's just rude and likes shouting at people in caps lock, telling them that their opinion doesn't matter'"
I have tried to be as nice as possible to people even when by nature, I'm not. When I type in big caps, it's to re-show, questions for evidence that I asked many times and that person failed to directly respond to it and dodge the questions. It has nothing to do with shouting. When I tell their opinion doesn't matter, it's because they only provide claims that are opinion based literally or no evidence at all, which is not relevant when arguing with simple facts. You cannot tell or say that i'm shouting at people without evidence, typing in cap=/= shouting , that is what that person thinks or feels which isn't a reflection of the reality and I explained above why I used them
"Ngl, I'm finding this Elhermanopadre guy to be getting on my nerves"
Once more, the "one my nerves" argument, proves it's more so their opinion rater than rule-breaking or something else.
"He also does it to non-DBS threads and characters, as long as it has something to do with Dragon Ball. A thread used to have a Dragon Ball character in it, but the Title and Characters were changed? Hours later he comments ‘(X) Blitzes and One Shots’ despite not even including a DB character in it anymore. and only give arguments when pressured. Even then, he doesn’t give a good argument, and others have to back him up."
That is wrong, in that one example you gave with your post, it was your fault for not doing that change in the first place, you shouldn't have to change the topic that fasts and expect other people not to comment on that same topic. It was never an hour later, it's like the very few mins (2-4mins), that I replyed not an hour ago. And yes, I say blitzes or one-shots because when I already know the obvious answer to the battle and I will give evidence if asked for it (I'm not forced to give any evidence if I wasn't asked for it in the first place).
he refuses to admit he’s wrong in any case, often using defenses such as ‘That’s just your opinion’ or ‘That’s Headcanon, Facts > Headcanon’, even when it’s irrelevant or, in his most recent case, during Fun and Games Threads.
There is nothing to admit when I literally won an argument and my opponent only claims statements that are heavily based on opinions or headcanon such as "I thought you knew more about db" or "DB wank" without any pieces of evidence, no proofs, and I even asked someone evidence for that and they answered was, "Didn't read". I always say stuff that is relevant in vs thread or vs threads that are posted in fun and game threads, it starts becoming less relevant when those persons replied to me with a statement that isn't relevant to the main topic.
Conclusion
Worth rule-breaking:
Necro (I wasn't aware of that when I recently join this wiki).
Derailing threads (I know people who did this and didn't get banned).
General facts:
-Most of those complaints come from people with who I argue and lost an argument and hate me as a result of that.
-Most of them when I argued against them failed to give evidence when I asked for it or trying to dodge evidence against them multiple times.
-Most of those complaints come from dishonest claims and not rule-breaking.
-Most of those claims come from people's opinions that can be twisted and changed with bias against someone else or what they think of me which isn't necessarily the reality or the truth.
- Someone those claims come from people who were making sarcasm statements in other threads.
