- 34,718
- 42,126
Pretty sure some "doxxing" allegations turned out to be false, but I'd rather we not talk about that to promote further drama. Anyway, he's permanently banned for other reasons, so we should just move on from that.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,075
- 29,797
Just to add fuel to the fire here in case we come to revisit it, I too advocate a ban. Shields is often disruptive for the sole purpose of being disruptive. Sustained behavior like that over a multi-year span is deserving of a ban, especially with the severity of the disruptions and the tendency to target vulnerable moments.
- 6,435
- 6,018
Reporting this user, for vandalism, which even involved reverting prior edits made by both GarrixianXD and Antvasima. It was already reverted, but it seems no-one has banned the vandal.
Update: it appears the original reverted edit upgrading Loki from 7-C to 2-A was made soon before this by this user, but this user appears to be generally a productive user, so I'm not as inclined to call it vandalism.
Update: it appears the original reverted edit upgrading Loki from 7-C to 2-A was made soon before this by this user, but this user appears to be generally a productive user, so I'm not as inclined to call it vandalism.
Last edited:
- 6,640
- 6,501
I was going to report this too
- 20,641
- 16,490
I've undone the changes but I might have made a mistake since I rarely do that. I wish someone would check it out.
This is how it looked after they edited it
This is how it looked after they edited it
- 34,718
- 42,126
Garrixian commented on his wall and he is commenting back. And was asking what the forum was, so probably just a clueless user rather than a malicious user.
- 5,163
- 11,792
@Catzlaflame Handled it.
- 1,628
- 1,789
- 5,163
- 11,792
I’m on phone rn and logged out of my fandom account. Someone else will have to handle them.
- 1,628
- 1,789
- 18,393
- 14,332
This comment is unnecessary. Please avoid making such remarks unless you have significant new and relevant information or are directly involved in the case.
- 2,508
- 1,154
Reporting this user Phantom04 for vandalising Rimuru profile ?
- 5,163
- 11,792
Dread already dropped him a warning and I was informed that he was playing around with the source code and didn't mean to save the changes. Though, @PhantomØ4 don't goof around again.
- 3,346
- 1,914
Would like to report @Expectro2000xxx . Generally disagreeing with someone alone isnt rvr worthy, but instead of directly responding to my arguments, he chooses to create patronizing comments, and tells people to straight up ignore my arguments.
- 13,905
- 5,421
Maybe you could start with showing images of this happening or at the bare minimum telling people where this happened?
- 34,591
- 35,024
@BasedNecoScaler69 You need to link to the posts in question.
- 3,346
- 1,914
(Archetype Earth 1-A) Arcueid > Your verse.
Nicely put together thread. Quite compelling if I were to be honest. Disagree FRA.
- 18,393
- 14,332
I wouldn't say it's report-worthy, as he is not forcing anyone to avoid responding to your posts but rather suggesting that they do so due to flawed arguments or stonewalling. The people can evaluate the facts on their own to determine whether it is true or not.
I would say he is more frustrated than disrespectful or insulting; if anything, both parties need to calm down.
I would say he is more frustrated than disrespectful or insulting; if anything, both parties need to calm down.
- 3,346
- 1,914
If an argument is flawed, you could just easily counter it no? Comments like these are completely unneeded.
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,024
Agreed.
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,025
I suppose that an instruction message to that member might be warranted, but not a full warning, and it is another member than the one you first reported.
- 3,346
- 1,914
I'm fine with that. I just hold the general belief that you should not call another member's arguments "bad" or "flawed" if it has some level of basis, especially when you refuse to back it up.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,163
- 4,395
I said that because you keep ignoring the text that has been shown to you multiple times, and I don't feel like dealing with that so early in the morning. Myself and others have shown clear frustration at this, and I'm frankly tired of it.
Also, I call everyone Lil bro.
- 3,346
- 1,914
And i've given appropriate counters. ( statements being worded as questions, further retcons by released media after KNK)
Magicomethkuon
They/Them- 1,308
- 1,425
I'd like to add a few pieces of information about this report, if I may, because I was reading that thread: There was nothing in that discussion that couldn't have been solved by exchanging a few more messages in the thread itself, between the parts involved. Things never escalated enough that it was necessary to take it here. This report also feels hasty because Neco did not first address Expectro's attitude being aggravating to them. As for Nanaya, he was taking his time and trying to debate his points.
I am another user and it's not my part to decide how this is handled but, as a suggestion, there are many such reports that can be resolved without making it a report if you just address the person you are talking to about it first. It also spares staff time. Even the back and forth directly above this comment could easily have been done in the original thread to reach common grounds. If and only if the other side persists in a behaviour that makes further discussion impossible, you take it here. That is all.
I am another user and it's not my part to decide how this is handled but, as a suggestion, there are many such reports that can be resolved without making it a report if you just address the person you are talking to about it first. It also spares staff time. Even the back and forth directly above this comment could easily have been done in the original thread to reach common grounds. If and only if the other side persists in a behaviour that makes further discussion impossible, you take it here. That is all.
Last edited:
- 18,393
- 14,332
There is a distinction between labeling an argument as 'flawed' and directly calling someone bad or insulting the user.
Regarding the 'response' to the flawed argument, as per the thread context, it appears he has responded nonetheless. Therefore, his reaction seems reasonable, given the frustration of repeating himself multiple times. I am not trying to defend him if he cross the line but he did not cross any line that deems to be report worthy.
Additionally, the comment you linked is from a different person. I don't find anything report-worthy in the user you reported in conclusion.
Any staff member is welcome to comment in this case, but I don't believe any serious instruction or warning is necessary.
Note: No need for back and forth. So refrain unless there is a pretty new relevant information to case itself.
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,918
For the record, I can think of many instances where an instruction message was not dished out to users who’ve said stuff that would make what Nanaya/Expectro said look like compliments.
Also, supposedly the irritation in that thread stems from the OP recreating and reposting the same thread/Arguments again and again. Now if it was just Nanaya/Expectro that were trying to relay this narrative, it’d be questionable, but I count six different users who claimed this to be the case. If this is the case, then a confrontational remark may be understandable.
Personally, I do not believe that any action needs to be taken at all
- 3,346
- 1,914
I've only posted a similar thread once before, and even then, I reconstructed and added a few new arguments. I requested to have the other one closed, so its ot like im posting rejected arguments
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,033
Okay. Never mind then.
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,034
Agreed. This seems to have been a waste of our time.
@BasedNecoScaler69
Only use the rather drastic solution of reporting others if it is genuinely about something serious.
Have you done this kind of thing previously as well? I vaguely recall that.
- 3,346
- 1,914
Someone reported me for something, I just outlined their general behavior in that thread. Otherwise I dont think so?
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,163
- 4,395
after checking using the search function, no, he does not.
- 3,346
- 1,914
I've only used the report function directly once before.
I dont think i've posted a large volume of messages in the recent staff promotion thread, just a lighthearted comment or two. I apologize if my behavior was seen as malicious in nature, it was not
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,039
Okay. That is good then. Also, I did not think that you or the other derailers were deliberately malicious, but it was still inappropriate for a public announcements thread, and destroyed for others there.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,626
- 4,350
@Prime2024 has been mocking people and derailing https://vsbattles.com/threads/issues-with-alien-xs-hde-and-immortality-type-9.160949/ with complaints about how we rank transcendence.
