Gewsbumpz_dude
Any/All- 3,659
- 881
But he is still using a sock to evade a Fandom ban
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyway, regardless of whether this is true or not (somebody would have to fact-check it), you must compulsorily have an account in the wiki if you want to be on the forum. If you have been globally blocked by FANDOM, then I am afraid we will have to block you too. How long is the ban duration by the way?ANormalGuest666 pretty much accused me if raging at him even tho it was false and it result in Golden and RK and Sky and the others to speak out against Guest because he tried to lie to the FANDOM staff and be aware that this dude rages and used suicide to guilt trip people and likes to hack people so if you think you wanna defend Guest cause of a ban that was flawed then you must be insane to defend a person like Guest who framed me and That is a fraction of what he did so
Ask anyone from the Ultra Z Wiki and they will back me up on this on why that Fandom block was flawed
I think they extend the ban duration for the main account but permaban the sockpuppetsOh, well ok then.
Don't we normally give infinite bans for sockpuppets?
cause they didn’t know about the sockpuppet yetActually they didn't extend my ban
Im not an admin I just said what I know so don’t jump to conclusions. its better to wait for Ant when it comes to things like thisSo ban him until his global ban expires (3 months)?
Ant already said that you just have to wait out the Ban and he will lift it for youEven then I did not act bad with my socks from FANDOM as well so I should be fine and Guest made lies against me so I am fine right?
BloodyBloodwork365
ultra-z-battle-wiki.fandom.com
Lmao Dan Hibiki at least 0, I mean he is a new user though
They're significantly better than 2/3 months ago when they where completely unmoderated. A bit of drama between a troll and another user is nothing. Me simply weighing in and warning the offending party is enough to calm things down mostly. It was also 4am at the time I checked it so I wasn't going to stick around too much longer.The discussions are a wild west right now.
I don't think it's going to happen. I personally have never seen an instance of Discussions being removed, ever. All staff are adaminite about not revoking it.NoGround:
Hmm. That is unfortunate. I suppose that disabling Discussions might have to wait until we have made our wiki more mobile and Google search friendly then.