- 94
- 10
ok so pretty much, principles are laws in tensura, and chloe transcended the laws of the world. As shown in the second scan, time is one of the laws of the world (keep in mind that laws are principles). and after doing this feat (transcending the laws of the world), they realized that chloe was a spiritual being. That would mean that to be a spiritual being, you need to preform that kind of feat. and the last scan is just even more proof that chloe transcends time.
-
-
Rimuru here is able to fight and defeat someone like veldanava who is a supreme deity which I think you all know he is. And rimuru himself has also already been able to go beyond a spiritual being.
-
-
Pretty sure he also performed a speed feat that even Chloe wasnt able to performe, but I can’t find that scan right now, so I’ll just leave it out. Also, Trying to argue against it by saying something like “moving in stopped time is not immeasurable speed” wouldn’t do anything because that is not the point here. She is only able to move in stopped time because she transcends it already. Chloe transcends the principle of time, and then it’s stated again that she transcends time. So the “moving in stopped time is not immeasurable speed,” doesn’t debunk this since it’s not the point being made here.
If someone has any objections to this, I’d like to hear them.
-
-
Rimuru here is able to fight and defeat someone like veldanava who is a supreme deity which I think you all know he is. And rimuru himself has also already been able to go beyond a spiritual being.
-
-
Pretty sure he also performed a speed feat that even Chloe wasnt able to performe, but I can’t find that scan right now, so I’ll just leave it out. Also, Trying to argue against it by saying something like “moving in stopped time is not immeasurable speed” wouldn’t do anything because that is not the point here. She is only able to move in stopped time because she transcends it already. Chloe transcends the principle of time, and then it’s stated again that she transcends time. So the “moving in stopped time is not immeasurable speed,” doesn’t debunk this since it’s not the point being made here.
If someone has any objections to this, I’d like to hear them.