Rework Angsizing Formula (This affects your favorite verse!!!)

[Debatismwis]

damn what happened?

 

[ByArrow]

I'll have to reread this thread later to see what the final votes were

Have you reread?

 

[Dalesean027]

Have you reread?

Nope been busy

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

I have several calculations that use the current ang size formula, does this mean I need to redo them?

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

yes, for better results, use this that i made regarding the formula made by OP forum

NEW ANGSIZE FORMULA

New Angsizing Formula --------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Live Action (Movies, TV Shows, Streaming Series) Do not use the old 70° vertical FOV standard. Modern films and television are generally shot i...

docs.google.com

Do they need to be re-evaluated as well?

Also why is it "Distance = Object Size • Panel Width ÷ [Object Pixel Size • 2 • tan(70° ÷ 2)]" instead of "Distance = Object Size • Panel Width ÷ [Object Pixel Size • 2 • tan(35)]"?

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

@Debatismwis will this be affected as well: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Planet_Curvature_Scaling

 

[Debatismwis]

Do they need to be re-evaluated as well?

Also why is it "Distance = Object Size • Panel Width ÷ [Object Pixel Size • 2 • tan(70° ÷ 2)]" instead of "Distance = Object Size • Panel Width ÷ [Object Pixel Size • 2 • tan(35)]"?

thats literally the same thing mathematically tho
70° / 2 = 35°

So:

2 * tan(70° / 2)

and

2 * tan(35°)

produce identical results.

the formula is usually written as tan(FOV/2) because it keeps the structure consistent if the FOV changes.

 

[Debatismwis]

@Debatismwis will this be affected as well: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Planet_Curvature_Scaling

potentially yes.

that page currently uses panel height and tan(35), which come from the existing vsbw 70° vertical angsizing framework. since the proposal specifically challenges that framework for live action and games, planet curvature scaling would likely need to be examined separately to determine whether the correction formula should also be updated. i wouldn't automatically call the page invalid but it is definitely connected to the same assumptions being discussed in this thread anyway.

 

[AmonInChains]

i made this to answer your questions - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zZJULCH1ZzncdEGQHL2kiH-xAF3618RFLRYfaG3NWTA/edit?usp=sharing

Don't use Google Docs, it's not allowed in the site.
Remove the link and move everything into a Fandom blog instead.

 

[Debatismwis]

Don't use Google Docs, it's not allowed in the site.
Remove the link and move everything into a Fandom blog instead.

i dont know how to do that but ill delete both of my comments then

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

i dont know how to do that but ill delete both of my comments then

Just create a user blog on the wikia