Regenerationn for Bowser

[Eficiente]

As Dry Bowser he should have High-Mid regen. Strong enough impacts can kill him tho.

https://youtu.be/i4ewBBCbxsc?t=339

Just that really.

 

[Kiryu2012]

Surprised this fact isn't on his profile already.

 

[Eficiente]

Yeah, me too. Also he should have Immortality types 2, 3 & 7.

Also also, a lot of Mario characters (mostly without profiles) can come back from exploding into nothing visible over time. I don't even remember what type of regen is that.

Edit: Like Petey Piranha.

 

[NotAMarioFan(lol)]

Seems sketchy but type 7 seem ok I think

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

It seems more like he reassembled himself, rather than regenerating himself. Sorry but we shouldn't include it.

 

[Eficiente]

I thought that reassembling also counted as regen, that's how Straizo got his.

 

[Kiryu2012]

It seems more like he reassembled himself, rather than regenerating himself. Sorry but we shouldn't include it.

Fair point.

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

Well, Straizo actually regenerated from the ground up, with several body parts being either broken or torn apart by Joseph's bullet hell. Dry Bowser.....just fell apart and re-assembled himself like Legos or a typical cartoon skeleton.

 

[Eficiente]

When Dry Bones reassemble themselves from that stuff they come back from the damage that was able put them in that situation in the first place. I believe that doing that is regen and that Dry Bowser scales to it. If not, then how about just something like "Can reassemble from having his bones separated" in his profile without linking any power?

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

I'll ask....

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

I asked an admin and it seems like this feat qualifies as Regenerationn after all.

 

[Eficiente]

Nice. What do you think of the immortalities?

 

[GyroNutz]

I agree with the regen and immortality for Dry Bowser.

I disagree with regen for any character that 'explodes' and comes back. They're either a different variant of the same species or it's just the game's way of telling you they're defeated (not dead)

 

[Eficiente]

I disagree with regen for any character that 'explodes' and comes back. They're either a different variant of the same species or it's just the game's way of telling you they're defeated (not dead)

Is Petey Piranha a species? Anyway this is wrong, I have confirmation that this is regen, just not combat applicable, characters like those rabbit in Odyssey definitely aren't a different variant of the same species, and I'm obviously not referring to minor enemies.

 

[GyroNutz]

This is honestly a massive stretch of what is shown in-game. It's like saying that Pokemon become intangible when fainting because they're shown to phase through the ground

 

[Eficiente]

What's shown in-game its them exploiting. False equalization, we know Pokemon are just being defeated and that are still there.

If anything, this happening so many times only makes it more consistent in the verse.

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

Gyro is correct, it's too vague to consider the ability for not just nearly every character in this verse but other verses that has this trope like Kirby. It's not even an ability to begin with.

Ask for Dry Bowser, I'm fine with Regenerationn and Immortality but only Type 3 and 7 for the latter since I don't recall any Type 2 cases.

 

[Eficiente]

It isn't correct to see someone exploiting and ignore it just because one interprets that those characters were just defeated, when does that interpretation stops? Does the exploration has to be graphic? How much so? It really doesn't matter, exploiting is exploiting. And if there is no evidence of those characters not being just defeated, like in Dark Bowser's case, then coming back from that is non-combat applicable regen.

I also asked this to Cal a while ago, I just don't remember what type of regen he said this was.

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

It's not an abilitiy. Period. This trope happens in other verses as well and has nothing to do with survival or story telling. Please drop it.

 

[Eficiente]

Why would I stop when I have confirmation from an admin? Same who also is ok with this being in other profile and give me permission to add it to another character's profile. If anything, I need to continue to see if I'm correct, and therefore argue for this.

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

I was referring to the "Explode and comes back" trope. Not Dry Bowser. He's fine.

 

[Eficiente]

I'm also referring to the "Explode and comes back", and now I need to verify that since I know many characters who have it.

 

[NotAMarioFan(lol)]

So should we add this?

 

[Dino_Ranger_Black]

I'll ask to add it later...

 

[NotAMarioFan(lol)]

Ok that seems fine