Bossbrosish
He/Him- 2,950
- 928
So, as I'm reading through NNT, I started to realize something about Tier 4 and the accepted cals and realized it doesn't really work for reasons I'll show. (I've brought it up before in the discussion thread, so I'll just post what I said there to here)
So I actually went back to check the feat for the Demon King and noticed something about the "starry sky" and the whole feat in general. It's just Zeldris explaining about the Behemoth and the claimed starry sky is just drawn stars and not like little dots. We're using a descriptive scene/imagery of something as an actual feat for the calc. The Behemoth shown is even completely different from the actual one, further emphasizing that's it's imagery.
The demon realm is also never shown with stars, but rather covered by clouds but does apparently contain two moons.
Now, regarding the King Arthur calc that was accepted by a calc member but never actually applied. Why are we using a cover image for a feat when these cover images are clearly used for illustrative purposes and have nothing to do with the story? Also regarding this in the calc, it's not saying there are starry skies in Camelot specifically, but places where you can see boundless stars in the sky (also, the answer is very vague and the doesn't even mention Camelot and I'm not even sure if the translation is accurate at all based on the wording in English), however this calc is still slightly valid because of the Cauldron of Annwfyn, which takes place inside of Camelot.
I do want to point out, however, that NNT does not have a Verse-specific Powers and Abilities/universal energy system page regarding the use of magic in the series and whether or not creation would scale to physicals (as per the rules and this). We'd also have to prove the stars/moons are legit.
As I such, I suggest characters get downgraded to these two 5-A calcs (Though, one of the calcs seems to have some problem with it now regarding density) and until a specific powers and Abilities/Universal Energy System page is created regarding magic in the series, anything regarding 4-B goes back to being via creation like in the old profiles.
Agree: 0
Disagree: 0
Neutral: 0
So I actually went back to check the feat for the Demon King and noticed something about the "starry sky" and the whole feat in general. It's just Zeldris explaining about the Behemoth and the claimed starry sky is just drawn stars and not like little dots. We're using a descriptive scene/imagery of something as an actual feat for the calc. The Behemoth shown is even completely different from the actual one, further emphasizing that's it's imagery.
The demon realm is also never shown with stars, but rather covered by clouds but does apparently contain two moons.
Now, regarding the King Arthur calc that was accepted by a calc member but never actually applied. Why are we using a cover image for a feat when these cover images are clearly used for illustrative purposes and have nothing to do with the story? Also regarding this in the calc, it's not saying there are starry skies in Camelot specifically, but places where you can see boundless stars in the sky (also, the answer is very vague and the doesn't even mention Camelot and I'm not even sure if the translation is accurate at all based on the wording in English), however this calc is still slightly valid because of the Cauldron of Annwfyn, which takes place inside of Camelot.
I do want to point out, however, that NNT does not have a Verse-specific Powers and Abilities/universal energy system page regarding the use of magic in the series and whether or not creation would scale to physicals (as per the rules and this). We'd also have to prove the stars/moons are legit.
As I such, I suggest characters get downgraded to these two 5-A calcs (Though, one of the calcs seems to have some problem with it now regarding density) and until a specific powers and Abilities/Universal Energy System page is created regarding magic in the series, anything regarding 4-B goes back to being via creation like in the old profiles.
Agree: 0
Disagree: 0
Neutral: 0
Last edited: