- 4,825
- 1,637
- Both are High 8-C, Rathalos is in his first key, Worm is in second key
- Speeds are equalized
- SBA is assumed
Purple Worm:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not how we use it here. I assume you are talking about the dice roll. We take it as if they get a 10, an average roll. And since most have at least a +1 save check, they have at least one layer of resistance.To be fair... D&D resistance is less consistent than most types of resistance in the wiki. If Rathalos simply attempts to do his thing enough times, I don't doubt he'd eventually succeed.
Eh, I don't necessarily agree with the way it's done, but since that's how it is, I accept it.That's not how we use it here. I assume you are talking about the dice roll. We take it as if they get a 10, an average roll. And since most have at least a +1 save check, they have at least one layer of resistance.
It does, I have accounted for that.Doesn't the worm, you know, burrow?
I also accounted for the fact that Rathalos can effectively counter this, albeit in a clumsy manner.Due to the Worm's tremendous size and odd method of fighting, however, it may still stand a decent chance at winning via coming up from underground and surprise attacking the Rathalos.
Monster Hunter creatures do indeed damage the terrain relatively often in their fights. Some of them even make it a strategy to attack the ground (namely creatures such as Diablos, granted), so I do think Rathalos has a (slightly) better argument here.whereas the Rathalos can just nuke the ground given enough time. Environmental damage isn't exactly a strategy of the Rath, but it is not unlikely to happen.
I moreso meant it often happens by circumstance. Environmental destruction is a common occurrence in Monster Hunter, most often by monsters ramming bits of the terrain (be it by accident or otherwise). The Purple Worm also has to come to surface some time, after all- it is the only way it can fight. However, the Rathalos bears no such weakness- it may fly indefinitely, and attack freely from there.Unless the creature showed this tactic I feel like assuming it’ll keep nuking the ground while flying is kinda weird
Plus nothing really prevents the Worm from just burrowing even further down, while the thing in the air the Worm can’t really see it that well so I don’t think it’s too wild to assume the Worm would just go further down
As for the poison, ehhhhhh the only large creatures that actually have resistance to poison which you can argue is of that are Giants no?
But even then other large creatures don’t get resistance to that so I think it’s kinda weird to assume the DC is human centric
Wyverns have like DC 15 and their poison is said to disintegrate veins and arteries and Purple Worm’s poison is far more potent then that so I think the poison will have way greater effects then you’re giving credit to it
Have you played Monster Hunter lolIsn't it like, not exactly in-character for Rathalos to just fly for eternity?
I seeI moreso meant it often happens by circumstance. Environmental destruction is a common occurrence in Monster Hunter, most often by monsters ramming bits of the terrain (be it by accident or otherwise). The Purple Worm also has to come to surface some time, after all- it is the only way it can fight. However, the Rathalos bears no such weakness- it may fly indefinitely, and attack freely from there.
I feel like the poison being tailored around humanoids doesn’t make sense from a lore perspective considering a lot of creatures with poison don’t hunt just humans, what we assume a Wyvern’s poison would be less effective on similarly sized creature like a horse?Sure, but I'm speaking in a general sense. It is a fact for poison that you need larger doses to affect larger creatures. I think basing the DC off of a human in a game where (almost) every playable race is approximately human sized is absolutely fair. The poison may well prove lethal, sure, but it will not be as effective to something of larger size, even if D&D fails to accurately portray this. To turn it another way, even if, say, a Gargantuan beast had no resistance to poison whatsoever, we would not assume it would die to rat poison of equal dosage as is required to kill a typical rat, aye? Same deal here. We shouldn't assume it takes equal amounts of poison to kill Rath as it would take to kill a normal dude. It is a minor point but in such a middling match, a point I feel is very notable.