- 37
- 10
This is my first CRT. Can suggest me that If this thread ends, what should I do next.
Old Calculation
New Calculation
The reason for CRT is that, within the old calculations, the formula was misused. Because the table is a type of beam with a support point at the edge of the table This prevented the fracture site from reacting to Loid's force. But it happened at the support point instead. which the supporting point can not see any damage Therefore, compressive strength cannot be applied for reasons before and now.
But my calculations only consider the law of conservation of energy. and fracture area It's a trace of shearing that cut the table. by the shear stress and the crack expands from the bottom up, so from W = Fs, the force F is the cross-sectional area times the shear strength. and the displacement is the trace length. which is the thickness of the table.
So, do you agree that this new calculation can be used on Loid's profile page instead of the old one?
Old Calculation
New Calculation
The reason for CRT is that, within the old calculations, the formula was misused. Because the table is a type of beam with a support point at the edge of the table This prevented the fracture site from reacting to Loid's force. But it happened at the support point instead. which the supporting point can not see any damage Therefore, compressive strength cannot be applied for reasons before and now.
But my calculations only consider the law of conservation of energy. and fracture area It's a trace of shearing that cut the table. by the shear stress and the crack expands from the bottom up, so from W = Fs, the force F is the cross-sectional area times the shear strength. and the displacement is the trace length. which is the thickness of the table.
So, do you agree that this new calculation can be used on Loid's profile page instead of the old one?
Last edited: